Bifurcation analysis of a prey-predator coevolution model

SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 1378-1391

  Dercole, Fabio ^a   Irisson, Jean Olivier ^b   Rinaldi, Sergio ^a,c  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^c INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bifurcation analysis; Coevolution; Evolution; Evolutionary dynamics; Lotka Volterra model; Monomorphism; Prey predator model

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EVOLUTION DYNAMICS;

BIFURCATION (MATHEMATICS);

EID: 0042476421     PISSN: 00361399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/S0036139902411612     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. P. A. ABRAMS, The evolution of predator-prey interactions: Theory and evidence, Ann. Rev. Ecology Systematics, 31 (2000), pp. 79-105.
2. P. A. ABRAMS, Modelling the adaptive dynamics of traits involved in inter and intraspecific interactions: An assessment of three methods, Ecology Letters, 4 (2001), pp. 166-175.
3. P. A. ABRAMS AND H. MATSUDA, Prey evolution as a cause of predator-prey cycles, Evolution, 51 (1997), pp. 1740-1748.
4. J. S. BROWN AND T. L. VINCENT, Organization of predator-prey communities as an evolutionary game, Evolution, 46 (1992). pp. 1269-1283.
5. N. CHAMPAGNAT, R. FERRIÈRE, AND G. BEN AROUS, The canonical equation of adaptive dynamics: A mathematical view, Selection, 2 (2001), pp. 73-83.
6. U. DIECKMANN AND R. LAW, The dynamical theory of coevolution: A derivation from stochastic ecological processes, J. Math. Biol., 34 (1996), pp. 579-612.
7. U. DIECKMANN, U. MARROW, AND R. LAW, Evolutionary cycling in predator-prey interactions: Population dynamics and the Red Queen, J. Theoret. Biol., 176 (1995), pp. 91-102.
8. E. DOEDEL, A. CHAMPNEYS, T. FAIRGRIEVE, Y. A. KUZNETSOV, B. SANDSTEDE, AND X. WANG, AUTO97: Continuation and bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations (with HOMCONT). Department of Computer Science, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, 1997.
9. E. DOEDEL AND J. P. KERNEVEZ, AUTO: Software for continuation problems in ordinary differential equations, Department of Applied Mathematics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1986.
10. R. FERRIÈRE, Adaptive responses to environmental threats: Evolutionary suicide, insurance and rescue, Options, Spring (2000), pp. 12-16.
11. S. A. H. GERITZ, M. GYLLENBERG, F. J. A. JACOBS, AND K. PARVINEN, Invasion dynamics and attractor inheritance, J. Math. Biol., 44 (2002), pp. 548-560.
12. S. A. H. GERITZ, E. KISDI, G. MESZÉNA, AND J. A. J. METZ, Evolutionary singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree, Ecology, 12 (1998), pp. 35-57.
13. S. A. H. GERITZ, J. A. J. METZ, E. KISDI, AND G. MESZÉNA, The dynamics of adaptation and evolutionary branching, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78 (1997), pp. 2024-2027.
14. G. HARDIN, The competitive exclusion principle, Science, 131 (1960), pp. 1292-1298.
15. J. HOFBAUER AND K. SIGMUND, Adaptive dynamics and evolutionary stability, Math. Lett., 3 (1990), pp. 75-79.
16. A. I. KHIBNIK AND A. S. KONDRASHOV, Three mechanisms of Red Queen dynamics, Proc. Roy. Soc. London B, 264 (1997), pp. 1049-1056.
17. Y. A. KUZNETSOV, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.
18. Y. A. KUZNETSOV AND V. V. LEVITIN, CONTENT: A Multiplatform Environment for Analyzing Dynamical Systems, Dynamic Systems Laboratory, Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1997; available from ftp.cwi.nl/pub/CONTENT.
19. P. MARROW, R. LAW, AND C. CANNINGS, The coevolution of predator-prey interactions: ESSs and Red Queen dynamics, Proc. Roy. Soc. London B, 250 (1992), pp. 133-141.
20. H. MATSUDA AND P. A. ABRAMS, Runaway evolution to self-extinction under asymmetrical competition, Evolution, 48 (1994), pp. 1764-1772.
21. H. MATSUDA AND P. A. ABRAMS, Timid consumers: Self extinction due to adaptive change in foraging and anti-predator effort, Theoret. Population Biology, 45 (1994), pp. 76-91.
22. J. A. J. METZ, R. M. NISBET, AND S. A. H. GERITZ, How should we define fitness for general ecological scenarios?, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 7 (1992), pp. 198-202.
23. S. MURATORI AND S. RINALDI, Low- and high-frequency oscillations in three-dimensional food chain systems, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 52 (1992), pp. 1688-1706.
24. D. PIMENTEL, Animal population regulation by the genetic feedback mechanism, The American Naturalist, 95 (1961), pp. 65-79.
25. D. PIMENTEL, Population regulation and genetic feedback, Science, 159 (1968), pp. 1432-1437.
26. M. L. ROSENZWEIG AND R. H. MACARTHUR, Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions, The American Naturalist, 97 (1963), pp. 209-223.
27. L. VAN VALEN, A new evolutionary law, Evolutionary Theory, 1 (1973), pp. 1-30.