The mirative and evidentiality

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 369-382

  Delancey, Scott ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Athabaskan; Evidentiality; Mirative; Mirativity; Modality; Tibetan

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042471557     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80001-1     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Agha Asif. Structural form and utterance context in Lhasa Tibetan: Grammar and indexicality in a non-configurational language. 1993;Lang, New York.
2. Akatsuka Noriko. Conditionals and the pistemic scale. Language. 61:1985;625-639.
3. Aksu-Koç Ayhan, Slobin Dan. Chafe W., Nichols J. A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. 1986;159-167.
4. Anderson Lloyd. The 'perfect' as a universal and as a language-specific category. Hopper P. Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics. 1982;227-264 Benjamins, Amsterdam.
5. Chafe Wallace, Nichols Johanna. Chafe W., Nichols J. Introduction. 1986;vii-xi.
6. Chafe Wallace, Nichols Johanna. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. 1986;Ablex, Norwood, NJ. (Advances in Discourse Processes XX.).
7. Comrie Bernard. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. 1976;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. DeLancey Scott. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language. 57:1981;626-657.
9. DeLancey Scott. Categories of non-volitional actor in Lhasa Tibetan. Zide Arlene, Magier David, Schiller Eric, Niepokuj Mary, Van Clay Mary, Nikiforidou Vassiliki, Feder Deborah. Proceedings of the conference on participant roles: South Asia and adjacent areas. 1984;58-70 Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, IN.
10. DeLancey Scott. Lhasa Tibetan evidentials and the semantics of causation. Niepokuj M. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. 1985;65-72.
11. DeLancey Scott. Chafe W., Nichols J. Evidentiality and volitionality in Tibetan. 1986;203-213.
12. DeLancey Scott. Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan. Cognitive Linguistics. 1:1990a;289-321.
13. DeLancey Scott. A note on evidentiality in Hare. International Journal of American Linguistics. 56:1990b;152-158.
14. DeLancey Scott. The origins of verb serialization in Modern Tibetan. Studies in Language. 15:1991;1-23.
15. DeLancey Scott. The historical status of the conjunct/disjunct pattern in Tibeto-Burman. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia. 25:1992a;39-62.
16. DeLancey Scott. Sunwar copulas. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. 15:1992b;31-38.
17. DeLancey Scott. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology. 1:1997;33-52.
18. Dickinson, Connie, forthcoming. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language.
19. Genetti Carol. The grammaticalization of the Newari verb tol. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. 9:1986;53-70.
20. Goddard Pliny Earle. The morphology of the Hupa language. 1905;University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. (University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 3.).
21. Goddard Pliny Earle. Elements of the Kato language. 1912;University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. (University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 11(1).
22. Goddard Pliny Earle. Texts and analysis of Cold Lake dialect, Chipewyan. 1917;American Museum of Natural History, New York. (Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 10, pts. 1-2.).
23. Goldstein Melvyn. Essentials of Modern Literary Tibetan. 1991;University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
24. Orig Modern Literary Tibetan. 1973;Center for Asian Studies, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL. (Occ. Papers of the Wolfenden Society on Tibeto-Burman Linguistics V.).
25. Guentchéva Zlatka. Guentchéva Z. Introduction. 1996a;11-18.
26. Zlatka Guentchéva. L'Énonciation médiatisée. 1996b;Peeters, Paris.
27. Hale Austin. Person markers: Finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. Trail R. Papers in South-East Asian linguistics. 7:1980;95-106 Department of Linguistics, Australian National University, Canberra. (Pacific Linguistics Series A, No. 53.).
28. Hargreaves David. The concept of intentional action in the grammar of Kathmandu Newari. Ph.D. dissertation. 1991;University of Oregon.
29. Jacobsen William. A grammar of the Washo language. Ph.D. dissertation. 1964;University of California, Berkeley.
30. Jacobsen William. Chafe W., Nichols J. The heterogeneity of evidentials in Makah. 1986;3-28.
31. Jin Peng. Lun Zangyu Lasa koyu dongcide tedian yu yufa jiegoude guanxi. On the relations between the characteristics of the verb and the syntactic structure in Spoken Tibetan (Lhasa dialect) 3:1979;173-181. Minzu Yuwen.
32. Ko Kyounghee. The integrated/new knowledge markers in Korean. M.A. thesis. 1989;University of Oregon.
33. Lazard Gilbert. Guentchéva Z. Le médiatif en persan. 1996;21-30.
34. Lazard Gilbert. Mirativity, evidentiality, mediativity, or other? Linguistic Typology. 3:1999;91-109.
35. Lazard, Gilbert, this volume. On the grammaticalization of evidentiality.
36. Leinonen, Marja, forthcoming. Evidentiality in Komi Zyryan. In: B. Utas and L. Johanson, eds., Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian, and neighboring languages.
37. Nichols Johanna. Chafe W., Nichols J. The bottom line: Chinese Pidgin Russian. 1986;239-257.
38. Plungian, Vladimir A., this volume. The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical space.
39. Slater Keith. Evidentiality in Minhe Monguor and the conjunct/disjunct system: Language contact on the Inner Asian frontier. 1996;Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara. Ms.
40. Slobin Dan, Aksu Ayhan. Tense, aspect, modality, and more in Turkish evidentials. Hopper P. Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics. 1982;185-200 Benjamins, Amsterdam.
41. Sun Jackson Tianshin. Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology. 63:1993;945-1001 Academia Sinica.
42. Tournadre Nicolas. Guentchéva Z. Comparaison des systèmes médiatifs de quatre dialects tibétains (tibétain central, ladakhi, dzongkha et amdo). 1996;195-213.
43. Watters David. The Kham language of West-Central Nepal (Takale dialect). Ph.D. dissertation. 1998a;University of Oregon.
44. Watters David. Mirativity in Kham. 1998b;Department of Linguistics, University of Oregon. Ms.
45. Woodbury Anthony. Guentchéva Z. Interactions of tense and evidentiality: A study of Sherpa and English. 1986;188-202.