Four approaches to telecommunications deregulation and competition: The USA, the UK, Australia and New Zealand

Industrial and Corporate Change

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 623-635

  Green, James R ^a   Teece, David J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042442705     PISSN: 09606491     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icc/7.4.623     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Department of Communications and the Arts (1997), 'Australia's Open Telecommunications Market: The New Framework.'
2. FCC (1996a), 'Preparation for Addressing Universal Service Issues: A Review of Current Interstate Support Mechanisms,' Federal Communications Commission Common Carrier Bureau, February 23.
3. FCC (1996b), First Report and Order, In the Matter of Implementation of the Local Competition Provisions in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, FCC CC docket no. 96-98, released August 8.
4. Oftel (1996) 'Policy on Indirect Access, Equal Access and Direct Connection to the Access Network,' Oftel statement, July.
5. Victor, R. H. K. (1989), 'AT&T and the Public Good: Regulation and Competition in Telecommunications, 1910-1987,' in S. P Bradley and J. A. Hausman (eds), Future Competition in Telecommunications. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA, p. 44