Facilitating College Writers' Revisions Within a Generative-Evaluative Computerized Prompting Framework

Computers and Composition

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 93-108

  Reynolds, Thomas H ^a   Bonk, Curtis Jay ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Computer based instruction; Procedural facilitation; Research, writing; Revision, writing; Self regulation; Writing, revision

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042437300     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S8755-4615(96)90038-9     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bangert-Downs, Robert. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing. Review of Educational Research, 56(4), 473-493.
2. Beach, Richard. (1979). The effects of between-drafts teacher evaluation versus student self-evaluation on high school students' revising of rough drafts. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 11-19.
3. Bereiter, Carl; & Scardamalia, Marlene. (1981). From conversation to composition: The role of instruction in a developmental process. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bereiter, Carl; & Scardamalia, Marlene. (1987). The psychology of written communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bereiter, Carl; Scardamalia, Marlene; & Steinbach, F. (1984). Teachability of reflective processes in written composition. Cognitive Science, 8, 173-190.
6. Bonk, Curtis J., Cavalcante, R., Liszewski, A., & Reynolds, Thomas H. (1995). Microgenetic analysis of developmental differences in preadolescent composing. Paper presented at the biannual conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
7. Bonk, Curtis J., & Reynolds, Thomas H. (1992). Early adolescent composing within a generative-evaluative computerized prompting framework. Computers and Human Behavior, 8(1), 39-62.
8. Bonk, Curtis J., Reynolds, Thomas H., & Medury, P. V. (in press). The technological and social transformation of work place writing environments. In Ann Hill Duin & C. J. Hansen (Eds.), Nonacademic writing: Social theory and technology. Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Bridwell, Lillian. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth grade students' transactional writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 197-222.
10. Bridwell, Lillian; & Duin, Ann H. (1985). Looking in-depth at writers: Computers as writing medium and research tool. In James L. Collins & Elizabeth A. Sommers (Eds.), Writing on-line: Using computers in the teaching of writing (pp. 115-121). Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.
11. Bridwell, Lillian; Johnson, P., & Brehe, S. (1986). Composing and computers: Case studies of experienced writers. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (pp. 81-107). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Bridwell, Lillian S., Sire, Geoffrey; & Brooke, Robert. (1985). Revising and computing: Case studies of student writers. In S. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. 172-194). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Caccamise, D.J. (1987). Idea generation in writing. In A. Matsuhashi (Ed.), Writing in real time: Modeling production processes (pp. 224-253). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Cochran-Smith, Marilyn. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61(1), 107-155.
15. Collier, Richard M. (1983). The word processor and revision strategies. College Composition and Communication, 34(2), 149-155.
16. Daiute, Colette. (1986), Physical and cognitive factors in revising: Insights from studies with computers. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(2), 141-159.
17. Daiute, Colette; & Kruidenier, J. (1985). A self-questioning strategy to increase young writers' revising processes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 307-318.
18. Educational Testing Service. (1984). Holistic scoring guide. Princeton, NJ: Author.
19. Emig, Janet. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
20. Faigley, Lester; & Witte, Stephen F. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 400-414.
21. Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 481-506.
22. Flower, Linda. (1979). Writer based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41(1), 19-37.
23. Flower, Linda; & Hayes, John R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(1), 365-387.
24. Flower, Linda; Hayes, John R., Carvey, L., Schriver, Karen, & Stratman, James. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37(1), 16-55.
25. Hawisher, Gail E. (1987). The effects of word processing on the revision strategies of college freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 21(2), 145-159.
26. Kozma, Robert B. (1991). The impact of computer-based tools and embedded prompts on writing processes and products of novice and advanced college writers. Cognition and Instruction, 8(1), 1-27.
27. Marascuilo, L. A., & Serlin, R.C. (1988). Statistical methods for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: W. H. Freeman.
28. Murray, Donald. (1978). Internal revision: A process of discovery. In C. R. Cooper & Lee Odell (Eds.), Research on composing: Points of departure (pp. 85-103), Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
29. Perl, Sondra. (1979). The composing process of unskilled college writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 317-336.
30. Purves, Alan C. (1985). Framework for scoring: GRE/TOEFL, Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Curriculum Laboratory.
31. Reynolds, Thomas H., & Bonk, Curtis J. (1990). A window on writing: The usefulness of keystroke mapping to monitor writing progress. Paper presented at the Sixth Conference on Computers and Writing, Austin, TX.
32. Reynolds, Thomas H., & Bonk, Curtis J. (1992). Repurposing the word processor. In N. Estes & M. Thomas (Eds.), The 9th International Conference on Technology and Education (Vol. I, pp. 535-537). Paris.
33. Salomon, Gabriel. (1988). AI in reverse: Computer tools that turn cognitive. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(2), 123-139.
34. Scardamalia, Marlene; & Bereiter, Carl. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children's composing. In M. Martlew (Ed.), The psychology of written language development and educational perspectives (pp. 67-95). London: Wiley.
35. Scardamalia, Marlene; & Bereiter, Carl. (1986a). Writing. In R. F. Dillon & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Cognition and instruction. Orlando, FL: Academic.
36. Scardamalia, Marlene; & Bereiter, Carl. (1986b). Research on written composition. In C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 778-803). New York: Macmillan.
37. Scardamalia, Marlene; Bereiter, Carl; & Goelman, H. (1982). The role of production factors in writing ability. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse (pp. 173-210). New York: Academic.
38. Scardamalia, Marlene; Bereiter, Carl; McLean, R.S., Swallow, J., & Woodruff, E. (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 51-67.
39. Smith, John B., & Lansman, Marcy (1989). A cognitive basis for a computer writing environment. In B. Britton & S. Glynn (Eds.), Computer writing environments: Theory, research, and design (pp. 17-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Sommers, Nancy. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Composition and Communication, 31(2), 378-387.
41. Talbot, J. (1986). The assessment of critical thinking in history/social science through writing. Social Studies Review, 25(2), 33-41.
42. Torrance, E. P. (1974). Norms and technical manual: Torrance tests of creative thinking (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
43. Witte, Stephen F. (1985). Revising, composing theory, and research design. In S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision (pp. 250-284). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
44. Woodruff, E., Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1981). On the road to computer assisted compositions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 10(2), 133-148.
45. Wresch, William. (1990). Writer's Helper Stage II. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa, CONDUIT.
46. Zellermayer, M., Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Givon, H. (1991). Enhancing writing-related metacognitions through a computerized writing partner. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 373-391.