Royal Bank of Scotland/Scottish economic society seventh annual lecture: Making Britain more competitive: A critique of regulation and competition policy

Scottish Journal of Political Economy

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 471-487

  Helm, Dieter ^a  

^a NEW COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION POLICY; COMPETITIVENESS; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; REGULATORY FRAMEWORK;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0042425804     PISSN: 00369292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9485.00210     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. CRUICKSHANK, D. (2000). Competition in UK banking: a report to the Chancellor of the Exchequer', March, The Stationery Office.
2. DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY (1983). Regulation of British Telecommunications' Profitability.
3. HAYEK, F. V. (1960). The Constitution of Liberty. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
4. HELM, D. R. (2000). A critique of rail regulation: Institute of Economic Affairs/London Business School Lectures on Regulation.
5. HELM, D. R. and RAJAH, N. (1994). Water regulation: the periodic review. Fiscal Studies, 15, 2.
6. HM TREASURY (1998a). UK Economic Growth, Productivity and Employment. The McKinsey Report, May.
7. HM TREASURY (1998b). Pre-budget Report: Steering a Stable Course for Lasting Prosperity.
8. MUELLBAUER, J. (1991). Productivity and competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 7, 3, pp. 99-117.
9. SCOTT, M. (1992). A new theory of endogenous economic growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 8, 4, pp. 29-42.