Single or double bounded contingent valuation? A Bayesian test

Scottish Journal of Political Economy

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 174-188

  León, Roberto ^a   León, Carmelo J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CONTINGENT VALUATION; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NATIONAL PARK; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

EID: 0042424760     PISSN: 00369292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9485.5002004     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. ALBERINI, A., KANNINEN, B. and CARSON, R. T. (1997). Modelling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data. Land Economics, 73, 3, pp. 309-24.
2. ALBERINI, A. (1995). Testing willingness-to-pay models of discrete choice contingent valuation survey data. Land Economics, 71, 1, pp. 83-95.
3. ARROW, K., SOLOW, R., PORTNEY, P., LEAMER, E., RADNER, R. and SCHUMAN, H. (1993). Report of the national oceanic and athmospheric administration panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, pp. 4602-14.
4. BATEMAN, I. J., LANGFORD, I. H., JONES, A. P. and KERR, G. N. (2001). Bound and path effects in double bounded and triple bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Resource and Energy Economics, 23, pp. 181-213.
5. CAMERON, T. A. (1988). A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. Journal of environmental economics and management, 15, pp. 355-79.
6. CAMERON, T. A. and QUIGGIN, J. (1994). Estimation using contingent valuation data from a dichotomous choice with follow-up' questionnaire. Journal of environmental economics and management, 27, 3, pp. 218-34.
7. CARSON, R. C., WILKS, L. and IMBER, D. (1994). Valuing the preservation of Australia kakadu's conservation zone. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, pp. 727-49.
8. CHIB, S. (1995). Marginal likelihood from the Gibbs output. Journal of the American statistical Association, 90, 432, pp. 1313-21.
9. COOPER, J. C. (1993). Optimal bid selection for dichotomous contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24, pp. 25-40.
10. DESHAZO, J. R. (2002). Designing transactions without framing effects in iterative question formats. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43, pp. 360-85.
11. HANEMANN, W. M., LOOMIS, J. and KANNINEN, B. (1991). Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, November, pp. 1255-63.
12. HEYDE, C. C. and JOHNSTONE, I. M. (1979). On asymptotic posterior normality of stochastic processes. Journal of the royal statistical society, Series B, 41, pp. 184-9.
13. LEAMER, E. (1978). Specification Searches. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
14. MCFADDEN, D. (1994). Contingent valuation and social choice. American journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, pp. 689-708.
15. MIN, C. and ZELLNER, A. (1993). Bayesian and non-Bayesian methods for combining models and forecasts with applications to forecasting international growth rates. Journal of Econometrics, 56, pp. 89-118.