Clinical evaluation of the HemoSonic monitor in cardiac surgical patients in the ICU

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 408-411

  Moxon, D ^a   Pinder, M ^b   van Heerden, P V ^b   Parsons, R W ^a  

^a SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Monitoring: postoperative, cardiac

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ESOPHAGUS; HEART OUTPUT; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; M MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT; MECHANICAL PROBE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MONITOR; PATIENT MONITORING; SEDATION; STANDARD; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 0042423725     PISSN: 0310057X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x0303100410     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Side CD, Gosling RJ. Non-surgical assessment of cardiac function. Nature 1971; 232:335-336.
2. Mark NB, Steinbrook RA, Gugino ID et al. Continuous non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output with esophageal Doppler ultrasound during cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 1986; 65:1013-1020.
3. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
4. Cariou A, Monchi M, Joly LM, Bellenfant F, Claessens YE et al. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by aortic blood flow determination: evaluation of the Sometec Dynemo-3000 system. Crit Care Med 1998; 26:2066-2072