Reverse Engineering under Siege: Is reverse engineering a lawful way to acquire trade secrets?

Communications of the ACM

Volumn 45, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 15-20

  Samuelson, Pamela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042417051     PISSN: 00010782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141 (1989)
2. Brief Amicus Curiae of Law Professors In Support of Affirmance to the California Supreme Court in DVD CCA v. Bunner, available at www.sims.berkeley.edu/~pam/papers/bunneramicus.
3. Chicago Lock Co. v. Fanberg, 676 F.2d 400 (9th Cir. 1982).
4. DVD CCA v. Bunner, 93 Cal. App.4th 648, 113 Cal. Rptr. 338 (2001)
5. DVD CCA v. McLaughlin, 2000 WL 48512 (Calif. Super. 2000); www.eff.org/pub/Intellectual_property/Video/DVDCCA_case/200 00120-pi-order.html.
6. McGowan, D. Free contracting, fair competition, and article 2B: Some reflections on federal competition policy, information transactions, and aggressive neutrality. Berkeley Tech. L.J. 13, 1173, 1998.
7. Religious Technology Center, Ltd. v. Lerma, 908 F. Supp. 1362 (E.D. Va. 1995).
8. Samuelson, P. and Scotchmer, S. The law and economics of reverse engineering. Yale L. J. 111:1575 (2002).
9. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Corley. 273 F.3d 429 (2d Cir. 2001).
10. Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd. 847 F.2d 255 (5th Cir. 1988).