Audit fee determinants: The plural nature of risk

Managerial Auditing Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 25-40

  Jubb, C A ^a   Houghton, K A ^a   Butterworth, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Company failures; External audit; Financial modelling; Financial risk; Risk management

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042414629     PISSN: 02686902     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/02686909610115222     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Simunic, D.A., “The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 6, 1980, pp. 329-43.
2. Francis, J.R., “The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: a study of the Australian market”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 6, 1984, pp. 133-51.
3. Firth, M., “An analysis of audit fees and their determinants in New Zealand”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 4, Spring 1985, pp. 23-37.
4. Simon, D.T., “The audit services market: additional empirical evidence”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 5, Autumn 1985, pp. 71-8.
5. Palmrose, Z.V., “Audit fees and auditor size: further evidence”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 24, Spring 1986, pp. 97-110.
6. Francis, J.R. and Stokes, D.J., “Audit prices, product differentiation and scale economies: further evidence from the Australian market”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 24, Autumn 1986, pp. 383-93.
7. Francis, J.R. and Simon, D.T., “A test of audit pricing in the small-client segment of the US audit market”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 62, January 1987, pp. 145-57.
8. Simon, D.T. and Francis, J.R., “The effects of auditor change on audit fees: tests of price cutting and price recovery”, The Accounting Review, April 1988, pp. 255-69.
9. Chung, D.Y. and Lindsay, W.D., “The pricing of audit services: the Canadian perspective”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 5, 1988, pp. 19-46.
10. Turpen, R.A., “Differential pricing on auditors’ initial engagements: further evidence”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Spring 1990, pp. 60-76.
11. Low, L., Tan, P.H. and Koh, H., “The determination of audit fees: an analysis in the Singapore context”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 17, Spring 1990, pp. 285-95.
12. Gist, W., “Explaining variability in external audit fees”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 23 No. 89, 1992, pp. 79-84.
13. Chan, P., Ezzamel, M. and Gwilliam, D., “Determinants of audit fees for quoted UK companies”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, November 1993, pp. 765-86.
14. Anderson, T. and Zeghal, D., “The pricing of audit services: further evidence from the Canadian market”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 24 No. 95, pp. 195-207.
15. Pearson, T. and Trompeter, G., “Competition in the market for audit services: the effect of supplier concentration on audit fees”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Summer 1994, pp. 115-35.
16. Mock, T.J. and Vertinsky, I., Risk Assessment in Accounting and Auditing, Research Monograph, The Canadian Certified General Accountants’ Research Foundation, Vancouver, 1985.
17. Kaplan, S., “An examination of the effects of environment and explicit internal control on planned audit hours”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Autumn 1985, pp. 12-25.
18. Wallace, W., “Are audit fees sufficiently risk adjusted?”, Advances in Accounting, Supplement 1, 1989, pp. 3-38.
19. Brumfield, C.A., Elliott, R.K. and Jacobson, P.D., “Business risk and the audit process”, Journal of Accountancy, April 1983, pp. 60-8.
20. Holstrum, G.L. and Kirtland, J.L., “Audit risk model: a framework for current practice and future research”, in Schultz, J.Jr and Brown, C.E. (Eds), Symposium on Auditing Research V, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 1983.
21. Warren, C.S., “Audit risk”, Journal of Accountancy, August 1979, pp. 66-74.
22. Auditing Practice Statement (AUP) 27, Materiality and Audit Risk, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, Melbourne, February 1986.
23. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Statement on Auditing Standards No. 47: Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit, (SAS No. 47), AICPA, New York, NY, 1983.
24. Auditing Practice Statement (AUP) 24, Audit Sampling, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, June 1985.
25. Auditing Practice Statement (AUP) 30, Inherent and Control Risk Assessments and Their Impact on Substantive Procedures, Australian Accounting Research Foundation, July 1990.
26. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Statement on Auditing Standards No. 39: Audit Sampling, (SAS No. 39), AICPA, New York, NY, 1983.
27. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), Statement on Auditing Standards No. 55: Considerations of the Internal Control Structure in a Financial Statement Audit, (SAS No. 55), AICPA, New York, NY, 1988.
28. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), Extent of Audit Testing (EAT) Study, CICA, Toronto, 1980.
29. Auditing Practices Committee, Audit Sampling, ICAEW, London, 1987.
30. Dirsmith, M.W. and Haskins, M.E., “Inherent risk assessment and audit firm technology: a contrast in world theories”, Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 16 No. 1, 1991, pp. 61-90.
31. Cushing, B.E. and Loebbecke, J.K., “Analytical approaches to audit risk: a survey and analysis”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 3, Autumn 1983, pp. 23-41.
32. Kinney, W.R. Jr, “A note on compounding probabilities in auditing”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 2 No. 2, Spring 1983, pp. 13-22.
33. Kinney, W.R. Jr, “Achieved audit risk and the audit outcome space”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 8, Supplement, 1989, pp. 67-97.
34. Huss, H.F. and Jacobs, F.A., “Risk containment: exploring auditor decisions in the engagement process”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 10 No. 2, Autumn 1991, pp. 16-32.
35. Jiambalvo, J. and Waller, W., “Decomposition and assessments of audit risk”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 3 No. 2, Spring 1984, pp. 80-8.
36. Daniel, S.J., “Some empirical evidence about the assessment of audit risk in practice”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 7 No. 2, Spring 1988, pp. 174-81.
37. Strawser, J.R., “Examination of the effect of risk model components on perceived audit risk”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 10 No. 1, Spring 1991, pp. 126-35.
38. Fellingham, J.C. and Newman, D.P., “Strategic considerations in auditing”, The Accounting Review, October 1985, pp. 634-50.
39. Shibano, T., “Assessing audit risk from errors and irregularities”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 28, Supplement, 1990, pp. 110-40.
40. Leslie, D.A., “An analysis of the audit framework focusing on inherent risk and the role of statistical sampling in compliance testing”, Auditing Symposium VII, Lawrence: Touche Ross/University of Kansas, 1984, pp. 89-125.
41. Aldersley, S.J., “Discussion of achieved audit risk and the audit outcome space”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Supplement, 1989, pp. 85-97.
42. Sennetti, J.T., “Toward a more consistent model for audit risk”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Spring 1990, pp. 103-12.
43. Woodhead, A.D., “Audit risk modelling”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 7 No. 5, 1992, pp. 3-7.
44. Skerratt, L.C.L., “Modelling audit risk”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 24, 1992, pp. 119-37.
45. Colbert, J.L., “Understanding the relationship between business risk and inherent risk”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 6 No. 3, 1991, pp. 4-7.
46. Simunic, D.A. and Stein, M.T., “Audit risk in a client portfolio context”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 6 No. 2-I, Spring 1990, pp. 329-43.
47. Ettredge, M. and Greenberg, R., “Determinants of fee cutting on initial audit engagements”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 28, Spring 1990, pp. 198-210.
48. Maher, M.W., Tiessen, P., Colson, R. and Broman, A.J., “Competition and audit fees”, The Accounting Review, January 1992, pp. 199-211.
49. Butterworth, S. and Houghton, K., “Auditor switching and the pricing of audit services”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, April 1995, pp. 323-44.
50. Dopuch, N., Holthausen, R.W. and Leftwich, R.W., “Predicting audit qualifications with financial and market variables”, The Accounting Review, July 1987, pp. 431-54.
51. Taylor, M.E. and Baker, R.L., “An analysis of the external audit fee”, Accounting and Business Research, Winter 1981, pp. 55-60.
52. Ball, R. and Foster, G., “Corporate financial reporting: a methodological review of empirical research”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 20 (supplement), 1982, pp. 161-234.
53. St Pierre, K. and Anderson, J.A., “An analysis of the factors associated with law suits against public accountants”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 59, April 1984, pp. 242-63.
54. Kaplan, R.L., “Accountants’ liability and audit failures: when the umpire strikes out”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 6 No. 1, Spring 1987, pp. 1-8.
55. Stice, J.D., “Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors”, The Accounting Review, July 1991, pp. 516-33.
56. Kreutzfeldt, R. and Wallace, W., “Error characteristics in audit populations: their profile and relationships to environmental factors”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Autumn 1986, pp. 20-43.
57. Kinney, W. and McDaniel, L., “Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol. 11 No. 1, February 1989, pp. 71-93.
58. Pourciau, S., “Earnings management and nonroutine executive changes”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 16, 1993, pp. 317-36.
59. Pratt, J. and Stice, J.D., “The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgements, required audit evidence, and recommended audit fees”, The Accounting Review, October 1994, pp. 639-56.
60. Schwartz, K.B. and Menon, K., “Auditor switches by failing firms”, The Accounting Review, April 1985, pp. 248-61.
61. Haskins, M.E. and Williams, D.D., “A contingent model of intra big eight auditor changes”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Fall 1990, pp. 55-74.
62. Eichenseher, J.W. and Shields, D., “The correlates of CPA-firm change for publicly-held corporations”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring 1983, pp. 23-37.
63. Altman, E., “Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy”, Journal of Finance, Vol. X, September 1968, pp. 589-609.
64. Zmijewski, M.E., “Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models”, Journal of Accounting Research, Supplement, 1984, pp. 59-82.
65. Watts, R.L. and Zimmerman, J.L., Positive Accounting Theory, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
66. Indeed, as noted in Table VII, the correlation between “business risk” and “audit risk” is less that 0.18 (or just over 3 per cent of shared variance given the proxies used).
67. Castagna, A.D. and Matolscy, Z.P., “The prediction of corporate failure: testing the Australian evidence”, Australian Journal of Management, June 1981, pp. 23-50.
68. Houghton, K.A. and Smith, M., “In defence of going-concern prediction models”, Australian Accountant, December 1992, pp. 23-9.
69. Houghton, K.A., “Business failure: symptoms and solutions”, 1990 Annual Research Lecture, Australian Society of Certified Practising Accountants, Melbourne, 7 November 1990.
70. Arens, A.A., Loebbecke, J.K., Best, P.J. and Shailer, G.E.P., Auditing in Australia: An Integrated Approach, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Sydney, 1990.
71. Thornton, D.B. and Moore, G., “Auditor choice and audit fee determinants”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 20 No. 3, April 1993, pp. 333-49.
72. Palmrose, Z.V., “The pricing of audit services: industry differences and other insights”, Proceedings of the 1983 De Paul University Research Symposium, Chicago, IL, 1983, pp. 47-84.
73. Grobstein, M. and Craig, P.W., “A risk analysis approach to auditing”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Spring 1984, pp. 1-16.