Model-supervised kernel smoothing for the estimation of spatial usage

Oikos

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 367-377

  Matthiopoulos, Jason ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOTELEMETRY; DATA PROCESSING; HABITAT USE; SMOOTHING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA; HALICHOERUS GRYPUS; PHOCIDAE;

EID: 0042412385     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12528.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andreassen, H. P., Ims, R. A., Stenseth, N. C. and Yoccoz, N. 1993. Investigating space use by means of radiotelemetry and other methods: a methodological guide. - In: Stenseth, N. C. and Ims, R. A. (eds), The biology of lemmings. The Linn. Soc. of London.
2. Augustin, N. H., Mugglestone, M. A. and Buckland, S. T. 1996. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. - J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 339-347.
3. Blundell, G. M., Maier, J. A. and Debevec, E. M. 2001. Linear home ranges: Effects of smoothing, sample size, and autocorrelation on kernel estimates. - Ecol. Monogr. 71: 469-489.
4. Boyce, M. S. and McDonald, L. L. 1999. Relating populations to habitats using resource selection functions. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 14: 268-272.
5. Brito, J. C., Crespo, E. G. and Paulo, O. S. 1999. Modelling wildlife distributions: logistic multiple regression vs overlap analysis. - Ecography 22: 251-260.
6. Buckland, S. T. and Elston, D. A. 1993. Empirical models for the spatial distribution of wildlife. - J. Appl. Ecol. 30: 478-495.
7. Cressie, N. A. C. 1991. Statistics for spatial data. - John Wiley and Sons.
8. De Solla, S. R., Bonduriansky, R. and Brooks, R. J. 1999. Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. - J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 221-234.
9. Dixon, K. R. and Chapman, J. A. 1980. Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas. - Ecology 61: 1040-1044.
10. Fedak, M. A., Lovell, P. and McConnell, B. J. 1996. MAMVIS, A marine mammal behavior visualisation system. - J. Visualisation Computer Animation 7: 141-147.
11. Legendre, P. and Fortin, M.-J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. - Vegetation 80: 107-138.
12. Matthiopoulos, J. 2003. The use of space by animals as a function of accessibility and preference. - Ecol. Model. 159: 239-268.
13. McConnell, B. J., Chambers, C. and Fedak, M. A. 1992. Foraging ecology of southern elephant seals in relation to the bathymetry and productivity of the Southern Ocean. - Antarctic Sci. 4: 393-398.
14. McConnell, B. J., Fedak, M. A., Lovell, P. and Hammond, P. S. 1999. Movements and foraging areas of grey seals in the North Sea. - J. Appl. Ecol. 36: 573-590.
15. Ripley, B. D. 1981. Spatial statistics. - John Wiley & Sons.
16. Robertson, P. A., Aebischer, N. J., Kenward, R. E. et al. 1998. Simulation and jack-knifing assessment of home-range indices based on underlying trajectories. - J. Appl. Ecol. 35: 928-940.
17. Seaman, D. E. and Powell, R. A. 1996. An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. - Ecology 77: 2075-2085.
18. Silverman, B. W. 1986. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. - Chapman & Hall.
19. Sokal, R. R. and Oden, N. L. 1978. Spatial autocorrelation in biology 1. Methodology. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10: 199-228.
20. Sokal, R. R., Oden, N. L. and Thompson, B. A. 1998. Local spatial autocorrelation in biological variables. - Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 65: 41-62.
21. Swihart, R. K. and Slade, N. A. 1985. Testing for independence of observations in animal movements. - Ecology 66: 1176-1184.
22. White, G. C. and Garrott, R. A. 1990. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. - Academic Press.
23. Worton, B. J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. - Ecology 70: 164-168.
24. Worton, B. J. 1995. Using Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate kernel-based home range estimators. - J. Wildlife Manage. 59: 794-800.
25. Wright, P. J. and Begg, G. S. 1997. A spatial comparison of common guillemots and sandeels in Scottish waters. - ICES J. Marine Sci. 54: 578-592.