Too much natural history, or too little?

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 1065-1068

  Arnold, Stevant J ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE;

EID: 0042412107     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2143     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Bartholomew, G. A. 1986. The role of natural history in contemporary biology. BioScience, 36, 324-329.
2. Bowen, B. W. & Bass, A. L. 1996. Are the naturalists dying off? Conservation Biology, 10, 923-924.
3. Farber, P. L. 2000. Finding Order in Nature: the Naturalist Tradition from Linnaeus to E. O. Wilson. Baltimore, Maryland: John Hopkins University Press.
4. Futuyma, D. J. 1998. Wherefore and wither the naturalist? American Naturalist, 151, 1-6.
5. Greene, H. W. 1994. Systematics and natural history, foundations for understanding and conserving biodiversity. American Zoologist, 34, 48-56.
6. Greene, H. W. & Losos, J. B. 1988. Systematics, natural history and conservation. BioScience, 38, 458-462.
7. Kingsland, S. E. 1985. Modeling Nature: Episodes in the History of Population Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought, Diversity, Evolution and Inheritance. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press.
9. Noss, R. F. 1996. The naturalists are dying off. Conservation Biology, 10, 1-3.
10. Provine, W. B. 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Wilson, E. O. 1989. The coming pluralization of biology and the stewardship of systematics. BioScience, 39, 242-245.