Evaluation in partnership: Practical suggestions for improving their quality

Evaluation

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 171-188

  Toulemonde, Jacques ^a   Fontaine, Céline ^a   Laudren, Emilé ^a   Ncke, Philippevi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042400659     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/13563899822208518     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Aldás, J. and J. Bigne (1996) 'L'impact Mapping Comme Outil d'évaluation des Interventions Publiques: Le Cas des Investissements FEDER dans la Région de Valence', Communication à la Conférence MEANS, Berlin, Germany.
2. Allan, G. (1996) 'An Analysis of the Scoring and Weighting Project Appraisal System in Scotland'. Placement Analysis Report, C3E and Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen.
3. Conseil Régional Rhône-Alpes, Argos and Price Waterhouse (1996) 'Evaluation de la Politique de Développement Économique et de sa Contribution à l'emploi'. Unpublished.
4. European Commission (1995) 'Applying the Multicriteria Method to the Evaluation of Structural Programs', in MEANS Handbook Number 4. Brussles: European Commission DG XVI.
5. European Commission (1998) 'Selecting Evaluation Tools', in MEANS Series on the Evaluation of Socio-Economic Programs, Number 3. Brussels: European Commission DG XVI.
6. House, E. R. (1995) 'Putting Things Coherently: Logic and Justice', in D. M. Fournier (ed.) New Directions for Evaluation, 68. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Knox, C. (1995) 'Concept Mapping in Policy Evaluation: A Research Review of Community Relations in Northern Ireland', Evaluation1(1): 65-79.
8. Leca, J. (1996) 'Gouvernance et institutions publiques. l'etat entre sociétés Nationales et globalization', in La France en Prospectives.Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.
9. Mathie, A. and J. Greene (1997) 'Stakeholder Participation in Evaluation: How Important is Diversity?', Evaluation and Program Planning20(3): 279-285.
10. Monnier, E. (1997) '"Vertical" Partnerships: The Opportunities and Constraints Which They Pose for High Quality Evaluations', Evaluation3(1): 110-119.
11. OECD DAC Expert Group on Aid Evaluation (1996) The Role of Rating Systems in Aid Management Experiences of DAC Member Organizations. Paris: OECD, DAC Expert Group on Aid Evaluation.
12. Rieper, O. and J. Toulemonde (1997) Politics and Practices of Intergovernmental Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
13. Roberts, R. and B. Wasik (1996) 'Evaluating the 1992 and 1993 Community Integrated Service Systems Projects', New Directions for Evaluation69: 35-49.
14. Roy, B. and D. Boussou (1993) Aide Multicritère à la Décision: Méthodes et Cas. Paris: Economica.
15. Sanders, J. R. (1997) 'Cluster Evaluation', in E. Chelimsky and W. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century, pp. 396-404. London: Sage.
16. Scriven, M. (1994) 'The Final Synthesis', Evaluation Practice15: 347-382.
17. Simos, J. (1990) 'Evaluer l'impact sur l'environnement: Une Approche Originale par l'analyse Multicritère et la Négociation'. Lausanne: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romanes.
18. Stake, R.et al.(1997) 'The Evolving Syntheses of Program Value', Evaluation Practice18(2): 89-103.
19. Trochim, W. M. K. (1989) 'An Introduction to Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation', Evaluation and Program Planning12(1): 1-16.
20. Vandendorpe, L. (1996) 'L'application d'une Méthode Multicritère aux Interventions des Fonds Structurels: Compte-Rendu d'un Projet Pilote', Communication à la Conférence MEANS, Berlin, Germany.
21. Vincke, P. (1992) Multicriteria Decision Aid. Chichester: Wiley.
22. Yin, R. K., S. J. Kaftarian and N. F. Jacobs (1996) 'Empowerment Evaluation at Federal and Local Levels: Dealing with Quality', in D. Fetterman, S. Kaftarian and A. Wandersman. (eds) Empowerment Evaluation, pp. 188-207. London: Sage.