Artificial fish schools: Collective effects of school size, body size, and body form

Artificial Life

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 237-253

  Kunz, Hanspeter ^a   Hemelrijk, Charlotte K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Body size and form; Collective behavior; Embodiment; Emergence; Group size; Schooling

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMMUNICATIONS; BIOMECHANICS; EFFECTS; MARINE BIOLOGY;

ARTIFICIAL FISH SCHOOLS; BODY FORM; BODY SIZE; SCHOOL SIZE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY CONSTITUTION; FISH; PHYSIOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; BODY CONSTITUTION; FISHES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 0042389606     PISSN: 10645462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/106454603322392451     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aoki, I. (1982). A simulation study on the schooling mechanism in fish. Bulletin of the Japan Society of Scientific Fisheries, 48, 1081-1088.
2. Bleckman, H. (1993). Role of the lateral line in fish behaviour. In T. Pitcher (Ed.), Behaviour of teleost fishes. London: Chapman and Hall.
3. Breeder, J. M. (1954). Equations descriptive of fish schools and other animal aggregations. Ecology, 35(3), 361-369.
4. Bumann, D., Krause, J., & Rubenstein, D. (1997). Mortality risk of spatial positions in animal groups: The danger of being in the front. Behaviour, 134, 1063-1076.
5. Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J. L., Franks, N. R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., & Bonabeau, E. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
6. Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., James, R., Ruxton, G. D., & Franks, N. R. (2002). Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 218, 1-11.
7. Deneubourg, J. L., Goss, S., Franks, N., & Pasteels, J. M. (1989). The blind leading the blind: Modelling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns. Journal of Insect Behaviour, 2, 719-725.
8. Hamilton, W. D. (1971). Geometry for the selfish herd. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 31, 295-311.
9. Huth, A. (1992). Ein Simulationsmodell zur Erklärung der Kooperativen Bewegung von polarisierten Fischschwärmen. Marburg: Department of Biology and Physics, University of Marburg.
10. Huth, A., & Wissel, C. (1992). The simulation of the movement of fish schools. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 156, 365-385.
11. Huth, A., & Wissel, C. (1994). The analysis of behaviour and the structure of fish schools by means of computer simulations. Comments in Theoretical Biology, 3, 169-201.
12. Huth, A., & Wissel, C. (1994). The simulation of fish schools in comparison with experimental data. Ecological Modelling, 75/76, 135-145.
13. Niwa, H.-S. (1994). Self-organizing dynamic model of fish schooling. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 171, 123-136.
14. Olst, J. C. v., & Hunter, J. R. (1970). Some aspects of the organization of fish schools. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 27, 1225-1238.
15. Partridge, B. L. (1980). The effect of school size on the structure and dynamics of minnow schools. Animal Behaviour, 28, 68-77.
16. Partridge, B. L., Pitcher, T., Cullen, J. M., & Wilson, J. (1980). The three-dimensional structure of fish schools. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 6, 277-288.
17. Partridge, B. L., & Pitcher, T. J. (1980). The sensory basis of fish schools: Relative roles of lateral line and vision. Journal of Comparative Physiology, 135, 315-325.
18. Pfeifer, R., & Scheier, C. (1999). Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Pfeifer, R. (2000). On the role of embodiment in the emergence of cognition and emotion. In G. Hatano, N. Okada, and H. Tanabe (Eds.), Affective Minds: Proceedings of the 13th Toyota Conference, Shizuoka, Japan, 1999 (pp. 43-58). Elsevier Science.
20. Reuter, H., & Breckling, B. (1994). Self organisation of fish schools: An object-oriented model. Ecological Modelling, 75/76, 147-159.
21. Reynolds, C. W. (1987). Flocks, herds and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Computer Graphics, 21(4), 25-36.
22. Romey, W. L. (1996). Individual differences make a difference in the trajectories of simulated schools of fish. Ecological Modelling, 92(1), 65-77.
23. Shaw, E. (1970). Schooling in fishes: Critique and review. In L. Aronson (Ed.), Development and Evolution of Behavior (pp. 452-480). San Francisco: Freeman.
24. Vabo, R., & Nottestad, L. (1997). An individual based model of fish school reactions: Predicting antipredator behaviour as observed in nature. Fisheries Oceanography, 6(3), 155-171.
25. Warburton, K., & Lazarus, J. (1991). Tendency-distance models of social cohesion in animal groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 150, 473-488.