Maxillary expansion in class II correction with orthopedic cervical headgear. A posteroanterior cephalometric study

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 281-285

  Kirjavainen, Mirja ^a,b   Kirjavainen, Turkka ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^b NONE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cephalometric; Class II division 1 correction; Orthopedic cervical pull; Posteroanterior

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MOLAR TOOTH; NOSE CAVITY; PATHOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME; TOOTH ARCH;

CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL MODELS; EXTRAORAL TRACTION APPLIANCES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MAXILLA; MOLAR; NASAL CAVITY; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; PALATAL EXPANSION TECHNIQUE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0042382797     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Heikinheimo K, Salmi K, Myllärniemi S. Long term evaluation of orthodontic diagnoses made at the ages of 7 and 10 years. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:151-159.
2. Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilgers JJ. Bioprogressive therapy. Part 5. J Clin Orthod. 1978;12:48-69.
3. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr, Tollaro I. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:502-509.
4. Tollaro I, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Tanasescu CD. Role of posterior transverse interarch discrepancy in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion during the mixed dentition phase. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:417-422.
5. Varrela J. Early developmental traits in Class II malocclusion. Acta Odontol Scand. 1998;56:375-377.
6. Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Am J Orthod. 1970;57:219-255.
7. Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T, Hurmerinta K, Haavikko K. Orthopedic cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in Class II correction. Angle Orthod. 2000;70:317-325.
8. Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof RJ. Bioprogressive Therapy. Denver, Colo: Rocky Mountain Orthodontics; 1979.
9. Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T, Haavikko K. Changes in dental arch dimensions by use of an orthopedic cervical headgear in Class II correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:59-66.
10. Ricketts RM. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:115-150.
11. Athanasiou AE, Vander Meij AJW. Postero-anterior (frontal) cephalometry. In: Athanasiou AE, ed. Orthodontic Cephalometry. London: Mosby-Wolfe; 1995:141-161.
12. Athanasiou AE, Droschl H, Bosch C. Data and patterns of transverse dentofacial structure of 6- to 15-year-old children: a posteroanterior cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:465-471.
13. Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM. A concept and classification of centers of rotation and extraoral force systems. Angle Orthod. 1973;43:384-401.
14. Hsiao TH, Chang HP, Liu KM. A method of magnification correction for posteroanterior radiographic cephalometry. Angle Orthod. 1997;67:137-142.
15. Huggare J, Lahtela P, Viljamaa P, Nystrom M, Peck L. Comparison of dental arch dimensions in children from southern and northern Finland. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1993;89:95-100.
16. Moorrees CFA. The Dentition of the Growing Child. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1959.
17. Bjǒrk A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:585-599.
18. Staley RN, Stuntz WR, Peterson LC. A comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusion and adults with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:163-169.
19. Skieller V, Björk A, Linde-Hansen T. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation evaluated from longitudinal implant sample. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:359-370.
20. Lindsten R, Ogaard B, Larsson E. Transversal dental arch dimensions in 9-year-old children born in the 1960s and the 1980s. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:576-584.
21. Ricketts RM. The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthod. 1960;30:103-133.
22. Mills CM, Holman RG, Graber TM. Heavy intermittent cervical traction in Class II treatment: a longitudinal cephalometric assessment. Am J Orthod. 1978;72:361-379.
23. Huertas D, Ghafari J. New posteroanterior cephalometric norms: a comparison with craniofacial measures of children treated with palatal expansion. Angle Orthod. 2001;71:285-292.
24. Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120:98-111.
25. Hershey HG, Stewart BL, Warren DW. Changes in nasal airway resistance associated with rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod. 1976;69:274-284.
26. Hartgerink DV, Vig PS, Abbott DW. The effect of rapid maxillary expansion on nasal airway resistance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:381-389.
27. Warren DW, Hershey HG, Turvey TA, Hinton VA, Hairfield WM. The nasal airway following maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;91:111-116.
28. Melsen B. Palatal growth studied on human autopsy material. A histologic microradiographic study. Am J Orthod. 1975;68:42-54.
29. Bjǒrk A, Skieller V. Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod. 1977;4:53-64.