A cephalometric comparison of black open-bite subjects and black normals

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 294-300

  Beane, Richard A ^a   Reimann, Glynda ^b,c   Phillips, Ceib ^a   Tulloch, Camilla ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bimaxillary protrusion; Black cephalometric standards; Etiology; Open bite

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; NEGRO; ORTHODONTICS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CHILD; FEMALE; INCISOR; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; ORBIT; PATHOLOGY; ROTATION; SKULL BASE; STATISTICS; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; AGE FACTORS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; OPEN BITE; ORBIT; ROTATION; SKULL BASE; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0042382792     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kelly J, Harvey C. An assessment of the teeth of youth 12-17 years. United States. DHEW publication no. (HRA) 77-1644. Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics; 1977:1-18.
2. Kelly JE, Sanchez M, Van Kirk LE. An assessment of the occlusion of teeth of children 6-11 years. United States. DHEW publication no. (HRA) 74-1612. Washington, DC: National Center for Health Statistics; 1973:2-7.
3. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Moray LJ. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the NHANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1998;13(2):97-106.
4. Cangialosi T. Skeletal morphologic features of anterior open bite. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:28-36.
5. Lopez-Gavito G, Wallen T, Little R, Joondeph D. Anterior open bite malocclusion: a longitudinal 10 yr. Postretention evaluation of orthodontically treated patients. Am J Orthod. 1985;87(3):175-186.
6. Hapak F. Cephalometric appraisal of the open-bite case. Angle Orthod. 1964;34(1):65-72.
7. Nahoum H. Vertical proportions: a guide for prognosis and treatment in anterior open bite. Am J Orthod. 1977;72:129-146.
8. Subtelny JD, Sakuda M. Open bite: diagnosis and treatment. Am J Orthod. 1964;50:337-358.
9. Trouten J, Enlow D, Rabine M, Phelps A, Swedlow D. Morphological factors in open bite and deep bite. Angle Orthod. 1983; 53:192-211.
10. Altemus L. A comparison of cephalofacial relationships. Angle Orthod. 1960;30:223-240.
11. Drummond R. A determination of cephalometric norms for the Negro race. Am J Orthod. 1968;54:670-682.
12. Cotton WN, Takano WS, Wong MW, Wong WL. The Downs analysis applied to three other ethnic groups. Angle Orthod. 1951; 21:213-220.
13. Jones OG. A cephalometric study of 32 North American black patients with anterior open bite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:289-296.
14. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 1959;29:8-28.
15. Tweed CH. The Frankfort-mandibular plane angle in orthodontic diagnosis, classification, treatment planning, and prognosis. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1946;32:175-230.
16. Kim YH. Overbite depth indicator with particular reference to anterior open bite. Am J Orthod. 1974;65:586-611.
17. Bjork A. Cranial base development. Am J Orthod. 1955;41:198-225.
18. Enlow DH. Handbook of facial growth. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1982.
19. Proffit WR. The development of vertical dentofacial problems: Concepts from recent human studies. In: McMamara JA, ed. The Enigma of the Vertical Dimension. Twenty-sixth Annual Moyers Symposium; vol. 36, Craniofacial Growth Series, Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1999:1-19.
20. Nanda SK. Characteristics of the long face syndrome. In: McNamara JA, ed. The Enigma of the Vertical Dimension. Twenty-sixth Annual Moyers Symposium; vol. 36, Craniofacial Growth Series, Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1999:127-146.
21. Faustini MM, Hale C, Cisneros GJ. Mesh diagram analysis: developing a norm for African-Americans. Angle Orthod. 1997; 67(2):121-127.
22. Richardson ER. Atlas of Craniofacial Growth in Americans of African Descent; vol. 26, Craniofacial Growth Series, Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1999:16.
23. D'Aloisio D, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V. A comparative and correlational study of the cranial base in North American blacks. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;102:449-455.
24. Wardlaw DW, Smith RJ, Hertweck DW, Hildebolt CF. Cephalometrics of anterior open bite: a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:234-243.
25. Dung DJ, Smith RJ. Cephalometric and clinical diagnoses of open bite tendency. J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:484-490.
26. Trottman A, Elsbach H. Comparison of malocclusion in preschool black and white children. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 110:69-72.
27. Emrich RE, Brodie AG, and Blayney JR. Prevalence of Class I, Class II and Class III malocclusions (Angle) in an urban population: an epidemiological study. J Dent Res. 1965;44(5):947-953.