Comparación de índices bióticos utilizados en el monitoreo de dos sistemas lóticos del noroeste argentino

Revista de Biologia Tropical

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 327-336

  Salusso, María M ^a   Moraña, Liliana B ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE SALTA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Algae; Argentina; Biotic indices; Monitoring; Plancton rivers

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARGENTINA; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PLANKTON; WATER POLLUTION;

ANIMALS; ARGENTINA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PLANKTON; WATER POLLUTION;

EID: 0042381568     PISSN: 00347744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anónimo. 1992. Métodos normalizados para el análisis de aguas potables y residuales APHA, AWWA y WPCF. Díaz de Santos (ed.). Madrid, España.
2. Carr, J.M., G.L. Hergenrader, N.H. Troelstrup. 1986. A simple, inexpensive method for cleaning diatoms. Trans. Amer. Microsc. Soc. 105: 152-157.
3. Claps, M.C. 1996. Structure and dynamics of epipelic algae from a plain river (Samborombón river, Argentina). Arch. Hydrobiol. 137: 221-263.
4. Cox, E.J. 1996. Identification of freshwater diatomes from live material. Chapman and Hall, London. 158 p.
5. Descy, J.P. 1987. Phytoplankton composition and dynamics in the river Meuse (Belgium). Arch. Hydrobiol. 78: 225-245.
6. Descy, J.P. & M. Coste. 1990. Utilisation des diatomées benthiques pour lévaluation de la qualité des eaux courantes. Rapport final. UNECD-NAMUR, CE-MAGREF Bordeaux CEE-B. 112 p.
7. Dufréne, M. & P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67: 345-366.
8. Dunn, Ch. 1994. Gaps in GAP. Plan Sci. Bull. 40: 120-121.
9. de Wolf, H. 1982. Method of coding of ecological data from diatoms for computer utilization. Geol. Survey Netherland: 95-108.
10. Gómez, N. 1998. Use of epipelic diatoms for evaluation of water quality in the Matanza-Riachuelo (Argentina), a pampean plain river. Wat. Res. 32: 2029-2034.
11. He, F., P. Legendre, C. Bellehumeur & J.V. LaFrankie. 1994. Diversity pattern and spatial scale: A study of a tropical rain forest of Malaysia. Environ. Ecol. Statist. 1: 265-286.
12. Huber-Pestalozzi, G. 1955. Euglenophyceen, p. 606-642. In G. Huber-Pestalozzi (ed.). Das Phytoplankton des Süsswassers. Systematik und Biologie, 4. E.Schweizerbart'sche verlagsbuchhandlung.
13. Huber-Pestalozzi, G. 1961. Chlorophyceae, p. 250-744. In C. Huber-Pestalozzi (ed.). Das Phytoplankton des Süsswassers. Systematik und Biologie 5. E. Schweizerbart' sche verlagsbuchhandlung.
14. Illtis, A. 1982. Peuplements algaux des riviéres de Cote d'Ivoire. Rev. Hydrobiol. Trop. 15: 231-239.
15. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot. 1986-1991. Bacillariophyceae.Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. G. Fischer, Stuttgart.
16. Komarek, J. & B. Fott. 1983. Chlorophyceae, Chlorococcales, p. 560-890. In G. Huber-Pestalozzi (ed.). Das Phytoplankton des Süsswassers. Die binnengewässer 16. E. Schweizerbart' sehe verlagsbuchhandlung.
17. Legendre, L. & P. Legendre. 1979. Ecologie numérique 2: La estructure des données écologiques. Masson, Paris. 254 p.
18. Liebmann, H. 1962. Handbook of the biology of freshwater and wastewater. R. Oldenbourg, München. 236 p.
19. Lobo, E.A., V.L. Callegaro, M.A. Oliveira, S.E. Salomoni, S. Schuler & K. Asai.1996. Pollution tolerant diatoms from lotic systems in the Jacuí Basin Río Grande do Sul, Brazil. Iheringia Sér. Bot. Porto Alegre 47: 45-72.
20. Margalef, R. 1997. Diversity and biodiversity. Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany. Excellence in Ecology. 10: 106-134.
21. Pantle, R. & H. Buck. 1955. Die biologische Überwachung der Gewässer und die Darstellung der Ergbnisse. Gas. Wasserfach 96: 604.
22. Rojo, C., M. Alvarez Cobelas & M. Arauzo. 1994. An elementary, structural analysis of river phytoplankton. Hydrobiologia 289: 43-55.
23. Sabater, S., F. Sabater & X. Tomas. 1987. Water quality and diatom communities in two catalan rivers (N.B. Spain). Wat. Res. 20: 901-911.
24. Salusso, M.M. 1998. Estudio de la calidad del agua de dos subsistemas de ríos de la provincia de Salta (Argentina). Tesis de Maestría, Universidad Nacional del Litoral Santa Fe, Argentina.
25. Schwoerbel, J. 1975. Métodos de Hidrobiología. H. Blume, Madrid. 262 p.
26. Shannon, C.E. & W. Weaver. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. Illinois, Urbana. 117 p.
27. Utermöhl, H. 1958. Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen-Phytoplankton Methodik. Mitt. Int. Ver.Limnol. 9: 1-38.
28. Van Dam, H., A. Mertens & J. Sinkeldam. 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Netherlands J. Aquat. Ecol. 28: 117-133.
29. Watanabe, T., K. Asai & A. Houki. 1990. Numerical simulation of organic pollution in flowing waters, p. 251-281. In Cheremisinoff (ed.). Encyclopedia of environmental control technology, hazardous waste containment and treatment. Hooston, Gulf Pvld.
30. Wilhm, J.L. & T.C. Dorris. 1968. Biological parameters for water quality criteria. BioScience 18: 477-481.
31. Whitton, B.A. 1991. Aims of monitoring, p. 5-8. In B.A. Whitton, E. Rott & G. Friedrich (eds.). Use of algae for monitoring rivers. Innsbruck.
32. Whitton, B.A. & M.G. Kelly. 1995. Use of algae and other plants for monitoring rivers. Austr. J. Ecol. 20: 45-56.