Context-based free-form annotation in XML documents

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 257-285

  Sohn, Won Sung ^a   Kim, Jae Kyung ^a   Ko, Seung Kyu ^a   Lim, Soon Bum ^b   Choy, Yoon Chul ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b Sookmyung Women's University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Annotation; Annotation interface; Free form marking correction; Rule based approach; XML

Indexed keywords

INTERFACES (COMPUTER); KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; XML;

ANNOTATIONS;

CONTEXT FREE GRAMMARS;

EID: 0042378785     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00013-2     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Acrobat Reader, 2001. Adobe, http://www.adobe.com
2. Adam, K., Dai, W., Suen, C.Y., 1991. On the Recognition of Handwritten Characters Using Neural Networks. Pattern Recognition - Architectures, Algorithms, & Applications. World Scientific, Singapore, pp, 115-135.
3. Adobe Acrobat 5, 2002. Adobe, http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat
4. aha! InkWriter Handbook, 1993. Microsoft Corporation. CA.
5. Amaya, 1997. http://www.w3.org/Amaya
6. Andre, J., Helene, R., 1999. Paper-less Editing and Proofreading of Electronic Documents. Proceedings of EuroTex'99.
7. Annotea Project, 2001. http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea.
8. Baldonado, M., Cousins S., Gwizdka, J., Paepcke, 2000. Notable: At the intersection of annotations and handheld technology. In: Thomas, P., Gellersen-Hans, W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing 2000. Springer, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1927, pp. 100-113.
9. Brush, A.J., David, B., Anoop, G., Cadiz, J.J., 2001. Robust Annotation Positioning in Digital Documents. Proceedings of CHI'01, Seattle, March 31. ACM Press, New York, 285-292.
10. Chong, N.G.S.T., Sakauchi, M., 2001a. Creating and sharing web notes via a standard browser. Proceedings of the 2001 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Las Vegas. ACM Press, New York, pp. 99-104.
11. Chong, N.G.S.T., Sakauchi, M., 2001b. E-coBrowse: an extensible web (co)navigation framework. Proceedings of WebNet 2001. Orlando Florida.
12. Christine, A., Randall, D., 2001. Resolving ambiguities to create a natural sketch based Interface. Proceedings of IJCAI-2001.
13. Davis, J., Huttenlocher, D., 1994. http://dri.cornell.edu/pub/davis/Annotation/annotation.html, CoNote (Annotation).
14. Davis, R., James, A.L., Victor, et al., 1999. NotePals: Lightweight note sharing by the group, for the group, Proceedings of CHI'99. ACM Press, NY, Pittsburgh, pp, 338-345.
15. Denoue, L., Vignollet, L., 2000. An annotation tool for web browsers and its applications to information retrieval. Proceedings of RIAO2000. Paris, College de France, Paris.
16. Dymetman, M., Copperman, M., 1998. Intelligent Paper. In: Hersh, R.D., André, J., Brown, H. (Eds.). Proceedings of Electronic Publishing, Artistic Imaging, and Digital Typography. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1375. Springer, Berlin, pp. 392-405.
17. EQuill, 2001. EQuill Corp. Visual Teaming, http://www.e-quill.com
18. Extensible Markup Language (XML), 1998. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3c.org/TR/1998/REC-xml-19980210
19. Fensel, D., Angele, J., 1999. On2broker: Semantic-based access to information sources at the WWW. Proceedings of WebNet99. Honolulu, Hawaii.
20. Goldberg, D., Goodisman, A., 1991. Stylus user interfaces for manipulating text. Proceedings of the fourth annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM Press, NY, South Carolina, 127-135.
21. Grønbæk, K., Sloth, L., P. Ørbæk, 1999. Webvise: browser and proxy support for open hypermedia structuring mechanisms on the WWW. Proceedings of the Eighth World Wide Web Conference. Toronto, Canada.
22. Gross, M.D., Ellen Y.D., 1996. Ambiguous intentions: a paper-like interface for creative design. Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. Seattle, WA, pp. 183-192.
23. Hardock, G., Kurtenbach, G., Buxton, W., 1993. A marking based interface for collaborative writing. Proceedings of the sixth annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, Atlanta. ACM Press, New York, pp. 259-266.
24. Heflin, J., Hendler, J., Luke, S., 1999, SHOE: A knowledge representation language for internet applications. Technical Report, CS-TR-4078, Dept. of CS, Univ. of Maryland at College Park.
25. HieBook Reader, 2001. HieBook. http://www.hiebook.com
26. Hummes, J., Karsenty, A., Merialdo, B., 1997, Active Annotation of Web Pages. First European Conference on Voting, Rating, Annotation. Web4Groups & the Future of Communication on the Internet, Vienna, April 21-22.
27. Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) 4.0, 1997. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/REChtml40-971218.
28. IMarkup, 2001. http://www.imarkup.com.
29. Kahan, J., Koivunen, M.R., Hommeaux, E., Swick, R., 2001. Annotea: an open RDF infrastructure for shared web annotations. Proceedings of the WWW10 International Conference. Hong Kong.
30. Knuth, D.E., 1986. Computers & Typesetting: TeX: The Program, Vol. B. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts.
31. LaLiberte, D., Braverman, A., 1997. A Protocol for Scalable Group and Public Annotations. NCSA Technical Report, http://www.hypernews.org/̃liberte/www/scalable-annotations.html
32. Marshall, C.C., 1997. Annotation: from paper books to digital library. Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM, Philadelphia.
33. Marshall, C.C., 1998a. The future of annotation in a digital (paper) world. The 35th Annual GSLIS Clinic: Successes & Failures of Digital Libraries. University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, March 24.
34. Marshall, C.C., 1998b. Toward an ecology of hypertext annotation. Proceedings of HyperText. ACM, Pittsburgh.
35. Marshall, C.C., Golovchinsky, G., Price, N.M., 2001a. Designing e-books for legal research. Proceedings of the First ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. ACM Press, NY, Roanoke, Virginia, pp. 41-48.
36. Marshall, C.C., Golovchinsky, G., Price, N.M., 2001b. Digital libraries and mobility. Communications of the ACM 44 (5), 55-56.
37. Meyer, A., 1995. Pen computing: a technology overview and a vision. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 27 (3), 46-90.
38. MS Reader, 2001. Microsoft, http://www.microsoft.com/reader
39. Nichols, D.M., Pemberton, D., et al., 2000. DEBORA: developing an interface to support collaboration in a digital library. Proceedings of ECDL 2000. Lisbon Portugal, pp. 239-248.
40. O'Hara, K., Sellen, A., 1997. A Comparison of Reading Paper and On-line Documents. Proceedings of CHI97. ACM Press, Atlanta, GA.
41. Ovsiannikov, I.A., Arbib, M.A., Mcheill, T.H., 1999. Annotation Technology. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 50 (4), 329-362.
42. Phelps, T.A., Wilensky, R., 2000a. Robust intra-document locations. Proceedings of the 9th WWW Conference, Amsterdam.
43. Phelps, T.A., Wilensky, R., 2000b. Multivalent documents. Communications of the ACM 43 (6), 83-90.
44. Portable Document Format (PDF), 2001. Adobe Corporation. http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/main.html
45. Price, M., Schilit, B., Golovchinsky, G., 1998. XLibris: the active reading machine. Proceedings of CHI'98. LA. ACM Press, New York.
46. Resource Description Framework (RDF) (1999). World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3c.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222
47. Roscheisen, M., Mogensen, C., Winograd, T., 1995. Shared web annotations as a platform for third-party value-added information providers: architecture, protocols, and usage examples. Technical Report, CSDTR/DLTR, Stanford University.
48. Rubine, D., 1991. Specifying gestures by example. Computer Graphics 25 (4), 329-337.
49. Sannomiya, T., Amagasa, T., Yoshikawa, M., Uemura, S., 2001. A Framework for Sharing Personal Annotations on Web Resources using XML. Workshop on ITVE 2001. Australia, pp. 40-48.
50. Sohn, W.S., et al., 2002. Standardization of eBook documents in the Korean Industry. Computer Standards & Interfaces 24 (1), 45-60.
51. Takayuki, K., 1993. Potentials and limitations of pen-based computers. Proceedings of the 1993 ACM conference on Computer science. ACM, New York.
52. Tsai, S.R., Jyi-Ta Chen, Ming-Ching K., 2000. A document workspace for collaboration and annotation based on XML technology. Multimedia Software Engineering, Proceedings of International Symposium. IEEE, New York, pp. 165-172.
53. Turk, M., Robertson, G., 2000. Perceptual user interfaces. Communications of the ACM. 43 (3), 33-34.
54. Vasudevan, V., Palmer, M., 1999. On web annotations: promises and pitfalls of current Web infrastructure. Proceedings of the Thirty-second Annual HICS. Maui, Hawaii, pp. 1-9.
55. Weiser, M., 1993. Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Communications of the ACM 36 (7), 75-84.
56. Wilcox, L., Bill, N., Schilit, N., Sawhney, 1997. Dynomite: a dynamically organized ink and audio notebook. Proceedings of CHI'97. ACM Press, NY, Atlanta.
57. XML Linking Language (XLink) Version 1.0, 2001. World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xlink-20010627
58. XML Pointer Language (XPointer) Version 1.0, 2001. World Wide Web Consortium, http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/CR-xptr-20010911
59. YEE, K.-P., 1997. The CritLink Mediator. http://crit.org/critlink.html