The role of lay panelists on grant review panels

Chronic Diseases in Canada

Volumn 24, Issue 2-3, 2003, Pages 70-74

  Monahan, Anne ^c   Stewart, Donna E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

^b TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Canada; Cancer; Consumer advocacy; Patient advocacy; Peer review

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONSUMER; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PATIENT RIGHT; PEER REVIEW; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHORT SURVEY;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; CONSUMER ADVOCACY; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; NEOPLASMS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH PERSONNEL;

EID: 0042377349     PISSN: 02288699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (3)

1. Batt S. Patient no more: The politics of breast cancer. Charlottetown: gynergy books, 1994.
2. U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. Orientation handbook for peer review panel members. Breast Cancer Research Program: UIS, Inc., 1997. Held by National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC)/Canadian Cancer Society (CCS), 1.
3. th Meeting of the NC1C Advisory Committee on Research, February 25-27, 1998.