Relative humidity is a key factor in the acclimation of the stomatal response to CO2

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 54, Issue 390, 2003, Pages 2141-2147

  Talbott, Lawrence D ^a   Rahveh, Eran ^a,b   Zeiger, Eduardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Acclimatization; Carbon dioxide; Relative humidity; Stomata; Vicia faba

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; PLANTS (BOTANY);

GREENHOUSE-GROWN PLANTS;

ATMOSPHERIC HUMIDITY;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ACCLIMATIZATION; ARTICLE; DRUG EFFECT; ENVIRONMENT; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMIDITY; KINETICS; LIGHT; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; VICIA FABA;

ACCLIMATIZATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENVIRONMENT; HUMIDITY; KINETICS; LIGHT; TIME FACTORS; VICIA FABA;

VICIA; VICIA FABA;

EID: 0042376134     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erg215     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Assmann SM. 1993. Signal transduction in guard cells. Annual Review of Cell Biology 9, 345-375.
2. 2. Plant, Call and Environment 22, 629-637.
3. Assmann SM, Shimazaki K. 1999. The multisensory guard cell. Stomatal responses to blue light and abscisic acid. Plant Physiology 119, 809-815.
4. Assmann SM, Snyder JA, Lee YJ. 2000. ABA-deficient (aba1) and ABA-insensitive (abi1-1, abi2-1) mutants of Arabidopsis have a wild-type stomatal response to humidity. Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 387-395.
5. Bunce JA. 1996. Does transpiration control stomatal response to water vapour pressure deficit? Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 131-135.
6. Comstock J, Mencuccini M. 1998. Control of stomatal conductance by leaf water potential in Hymenoclea salsola (T. & G.), a desert subshrub. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 1029-1038.
7. Cousson A. 2000. Analysis of the sensing and transducing processes implicated in the stomatal responses to carbon dioxide in Commelina communis L. Plant, Cell and Environment 23, 487-495.
8. Farquhar GD, Dubbe DR, Raschke K. 1978. Gain of the feedback loop involving carbon dioxide and stomata. Plant Physiology 62, 406-412.
9. 2 concentration and the carbon exchange rates of saplings of Pinus taeda L. and Liquidamber styraciflua L. Tree Physiology 4, 255-262.
10. Francis PB, Parks WL. 1988. Canopy carbon dioxide profile in relation to row spacing of 'Essex' soybean. Agronomy Journal 80, 425-430.
11. 2 response of Vicia cells acclimates to growth environment. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1-6.
12. Heath OVS, Russell J. 1954. An investigation of the light response of wheat stomata with the attempted elimination of control by the mesophyll. II. Interactions with carbon dioxide. Journal of Experimental Botany 5, 269-292.
13. 4 plants. Plant Cell Physiology 34, 113-119.
14. 2 in Arabidiposis thaliana. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25, 785-791.
15. Meinzer FC. 1982. The effect of vapor pressure on stomatal control of gas exchange in Douglas fir (Psuedotsuga menziesii) saplings. Oecologia 54, 236-242.
16. Meinzer FC, Hinckley TM, Ceulemans R. 1997. Apparent responses of stomata to transpiration and humidity in a hybrid poplar canopy. Plant, Cell and Environment 20, 1301-1308.
17. 2. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar GD, Cowan IR eds. Stomatal function. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 229-252.
18. 2 and stomata. New Phytologist 149, 154-156.
19. 2 concentrations other than intercellular? Plant Physiology 86, 200-203.
20. Mott KA, Parkhurst DF. 1991. Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant, Cell and Environment 14, 509-515.
21. 2 et la lumière sur l'appareil stomatique séparé du mésophylle. Botaniste 40, 195-212.
22. Raschke K. 1975. Simultaneous requirement of carbon dioxide and abscisic acid for stomatal closing in Xanthium strumarium L. Planta 125, 243-259.
23. Raschke K, Hanebuth WF, Farquhar GD. 1978. Relationship between stomatal conductance and light intensity in leaves of Zea mays L. derived from experiments using the mesophyll as shade. Planta 139, 73-77.
24. 2-enriched atmosphere and elevated temperature in Chenopodium album. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23, 467-478.
25. Sharkey TD, Raschke K. 1981. Separation and measurement of direct and indirect effects of light on stomata. Plant Physiology 68, 33-40.
26. Sheriff DW. 1979. Stomatal aperture and the sensing of the environment by guard cells. Plant, Cell and Environment 2, 15-22.
27. Schroeder JI, Allen GJ, Hugouvieux V, Kwak JM, Waner D. 2001. Guard cell signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 52, 627-658.
28. Srivastava A, Lu Z-M, Zeiger E. 1995. Modification of guard cell properties in advanced lines of Pima cotton bred for higher yields and heat resistance. Plant Science 108, 125-131.
29. 2. Plant, Cell and Environment 19, 1188-1194.
30. Tardieu F, Davies WJ. 1993. Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 16, 341-349.
31. 2: ecological consequences. New Phytologist 153, 477-484.
32. Zeiger E. 2000. Sensory transduction of blue light in guard cells. Trends in Plant Science 5, 183-185.
33. 2 is linked to changes in guard cell zeaxanthin. Plant, Cell and Environment 21, 813-820.