On the visual distinctiveness of words in the English lexicon

Journal of Phonetics

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 367-376

  MacEachern, Margaret R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042351048     PISSN: 00954470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jpho.2000.0119     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Auer E. T. Jr, Bernstein L. E. Speechreading and the structure of the lexicon: computationally modeling the effects of reduced phonetic distinctiveness on lexical uniqueness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 102:1997;3704-3710.
2. Berger K. W. Visemes and homophenous words. The Teacher of the Deaf. 70:1972;396-399.
3. Bernstein L. E., Demorest M. E., Eberhardt S. P. A computational approach to analyzing sentential speech perception: phoneme-to-phoneme stimulus-response alignment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 95:1994;3617-3622.
4. Bernstein L. E., Demorest M. E., Tucker P. E. Speech perception without hearing. Perception & Psychophysics. 62:2000a;233-252.
5. Eberhardt S. P., Bernstein L. E., Demorest M. E., Goldstein M. H. Jr. Speechreading sentences with single-channel vibrotactile presentations of voice fundamental frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 88:1990;1274-1285.
6. Hockett, C. F. 1958, 1964, A course in modern linguistics, New York, The Macmillan Company.
7. Huttenlocher D. P., Zue V. W. Phonotactic and lexical constraints in speech recognition. Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence. 1983;. p. 172-176.
8. Iverson P., Bernstein L. E., Auer E. T. Jr. Modeling the interaction of phonemic intelligibility and lexical structure in audiovisual word recognition. Speech Communication. 26:1998;45-63.
9. Jackson P. L. The theoretical minimal unit for visual speech perception: visemes and coarticulation. DeFillipo C., Sims D. New reflections on speechreading. 1988;99-115 A. G. Bell Association for the Deaf, Washington.
10. Jeffers J., Barley M. Speechreading (lipreading). 1971;Thomas, Springfield.
11. Kricos P. B., Lesner S. A. Differences in visual intelligibility across talkers. The Volta Review. 84:1982;219-225.
12. Kucera H., Francis W. Computational analysis of present-day American English. 1967;Brown University Press, Providence.
13. Lesner S. A. The talker. DeFillipo C., Sims D. New reflections on speechreading. 1988;89-98 A. G. Bell Association for the Deaf, Washington.
14. Maddieson I. Patterns of sounds. 1984;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. McGurk H., MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature. 264:1976;746-748.
16. Montgomery A. A., Jackson P. L. The physical characteristics of lips underlying vowel lipreading performance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 73:1983;2134-2144.
17. Nitchie E. B. The use of homophenous words. The Volta Review. 18:1916;85-93.
18. Nusbaum H. C., Pisoni D. B., Davis C. K. Sizing up the Hoosier Mental Lexicon: measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words. 1984;Indiana University.
19. Pisoni D. B., Nusbaum H. C., Luce P. A., Slowiaczeck L. M. Speech perception, word recognition, and the structure of the lexicon. Speech Communication. 4:1985;75-95.
20. Seitz, P. F. Bernstein, L. E. Auer, Jr, E. T. 1995, PhLex: A phonemic lexicon of American English.
21. Shipman D. W., Zue V. W. Properties of large lexicons: implications for advanced isolated word recognition systems. Proceedings of the international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing. 1982;. p. 546-549.
22. Vernon M., Mindel E. D. Psychological and psychiatric aspects of profound hearing loss. Rose D. E. Audiological assessment. 1971;87-132 Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
23. Waibel A. Towards very large vocabulary word recognition. 1982;Carnegie-Mellon UniversityDepartment of Computer Science.