Seismic performance assessment of stainless steel frames

Journal of Constructional Steel Research

Volumn 59, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1289-1319

  Di Sarno, L ^a   Elnashai, A S ^b   Nethercot, D A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behaviour factor; Frames; Overstrength; Seismic design; Stainless steel; Steel; Structural performance

Indexed keywords

CARBON STEEL; CIVIL ENGINEERING; DEFORMATION; ENERGY ABSORPTION; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE;

STAINLESS STEEL;

SEISMIC RESPONSE; STEEL FRAME;

EID: 0042347455     PISSN: 0143974X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0143-974X(03)00067-1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Euro Inox. (1994). Design manual for structural stainless steel. Toronto, Canada: European Stainless Steel Development - Information Group, Nickel Development Institute.
2. Eurocode 3 (1996). Design of steel structures. Part 1.4: General rules-Supplementary rules for stainless steel, European Communities for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium.
3. Aoki H. Establishment of design standards and current practice for stainless steel structural design in Japan Journal of Constructional Steel Research 54 1 2000 191-210
4. Burgan B.A. Baddoo N.R. Gilsenan K.A. Structural design of stainless steel members: comparison between Eurocode 3, Part 1.4 and tests results Journal of Constructional Steel Research 54 1 2000 51-73
5. Johansson B. Olsson A. Current design practice and research on stainless steel structures in Sweden Journal of Constructional Steel Research 54 1 2000 3-29
6. Di Sarno, L., Elnashai, A.S. and Nethercot, D.A. (2002). Comparison between seismic response characteristics of carbon steel and stainless steel. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference of Earthquake Engineering, London, UK, Paper No.765 (CD-ROM).
7. Manzocchi, G.M.E., Chryssanthopoulos, M. and Elnashai, A.S. (1992). Statistical analysis of steel tensile test data and implications on seismic design criteria. ESEE Research Report No. 92-7, London, UK: Imperial College.
8. Byfield, M.P. (1996). Steel design and reliability using Eurocode 3. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, Department of Civil Engineering, Nottingham, UK.
9. Cecconi, A., Croce, P. and Salvatore, W. (1997). Statistical properties of the European production of structural steels. Proceedings of ESREL 97 in Advances in Safety and Reliability, 1567-1574.
10. Byfield M.P. Nethercot D.A. Material and geometric properties of structural steel for use in design Journal of the Institution of Structural Engineers 75 21 1997 363-367
11. Eurocode 3 (1992). Design of steel structures. Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buildings, European Communities for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium.
12. Krieg R.D. A practical two surface plasticity theory Journal of Applied Mechanics Trans ASME 42 1975 641-646
13. Petersson H. Popov E.P. Constitutive relations for generalized loadings Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 103 EM4 1977 611-627
14. Popov E.P. Petersson H. Cyclic metal plasticity: experiments and theory Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 104 EM6 1978 1371-1388
15. Elnashai A.S. Izzuddin B.A. Modelling of material non linearities in steel structures subjected to transient dynamic loading Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 22 6 1993 509-532
16. Rasmussen K.J.R. Recent research on stainless steel tubular structures Journal of Constructional Steel Research 54 1 2000 68-75
17. Mirambell E. Real E. On the calculation of deflections in structural stainless beams: an experimental and numerical investigation Journal of Constructional Steel Research 54 1 2000 109-133
18. Mizuno E. Kato M. Fukumoto Y. Multi-surface model application to beam-columns subjected to cyclic loads Journal of Constructional Steel Research 7 4 1987 253-277
19. Broderick B.M. Elnashai A.S. Seismic resistance of composite beam-columns in multistorey structures. Part 2: Analytical model and discussion of results Journal of Constructional Steel Research 30 1 1994 231-258
20. Elnashai A.S. Broderick B.M. Seismic response of composite frames-II. Calculation of behaviour factors Engineering Structures 18 9 1996 707-723
21. Izzuddin BA, Elnashai AS. ADAPT, A Program for the adaptive large displacement elasto-plastic dynamic analysis of steel, concrete and composite frames. ESEE Research Report No.7-89. London, UK: Imperial College; 1989.
22. Eurocode 8 (1998). Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. Part 1.3: General rules. Specific rules for various materials and elements. European Communities for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium.
23. International Code Council (2000). International Building Code. Whittier, California.
24. American Institute of Steel Construction Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings 1997 AISC Chicago, IL
25. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000). Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. Report No. FEMA 350. Washington, DC.
26. EN 10025 (1990). Hot rolled products of non alloy structural steels. Technical delivery condition, European Communities for Standardisation, Brussels, Belgium.
27. Kato B. Rotation capacity of H-section members as determined by local buckling Journal of Constructional Steel Research 13 2-3 1989 95-109
28. Horne M.R. An approximate method for calculating the elastic critical loads of multistorey plane frames The Structural Engineering 53 6 1975 242-248
29. Bernal D. Instability of buildings during seismic response Engineering Structures 20 4-6 1998 496-502
30. CSI (1999). SAP2000: Integrated structural design and analysis software. Berkeley, CA: Computer and Structures, Inc.
31. Elnashai A.S. Elghazouli A.Y. Danesh Ashtiani F.A. Response of semirigid steel frames to cyclic and earthquake loads Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 124 8 1998 857-867
32. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000). State of Art Report on past performance of steel moment frame buildings in earthquakes. Report No. FEMA 355E. Washington, DC.
33. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2001). NEHRP Recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Part 2-Commentary. Report No. FEMA 369, Washington, DC.
34. Mwafy A.M. Elnashai A.S. Calibration of force reduction factors of RC buildings Journal of Earthquake Engineering 6 2 2002 239-273
35. Borzi B. Elnashai A.S. Refined force reduction factor for seismic design Engineering Structures 22 10 2000 1244-1260
36. Applied Technology Council (1995). Structural response modification factors, ATC Report No.19, Redwood City, CA.