The two trace transfer problem re-examined

Science and Justice - Journal of the Forensic Science Society

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 127-134

  Triggs, C M ^a   Buckleton, J S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b FORENSIC SCIENCE SERVICE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Forensic science; Interpretation; Two trace

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FORENSIC SCIENCE; GUILT; OFFENDER; PROBABILITY; RAPE; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; SPERM; STAIN;

EID: 0042338800     PISSN: 13550306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1355-0306(03)71759-6     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Evett IW. On Meaningful Questions: A Two-Trace Transfer Problem. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 1987, 27: 375-381.
2. Aitken CGG. Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists. Statistics in Practice, ed. V. Barnett. 1995, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
3. Evett IW and BS Weir. Interpreting DNA Evidence - Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists. 1998, Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
4. Evett IW. Establishing the Evidential Value of a Small Quantity of Material Found at a Crime Scene, Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 1993, 33(2): p. 83-86
5. Stoney DA. Relaxation of the Assumption of Relevance and an Application to One-Trace and Two-Trace Problems. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 1994, 34: 17-21.
6. Cook R et al. A Hierarchy of Propositions: Deciding Which Level to Address in Casework. Science and Justice, 1998, 38(4): 231-240.
7. Evett IW, Jackson G and Lambert J. More in the Hierarchy of Propositions: Exploring the Distinction Between Explanations and Propositions. Science and Justice, 2000. 40(1): 3-10.
8. Evett IW and Buckleton J. The Interpretation of Glass Evidence - A Practical Approach. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 1990, 30: 215-223.