Exports, imports, and economic growth in Portugal: Evidence from causality and cointegration analysis

Economic Modelling

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 613-623

  Ramos, Francisco F Ribeiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042326242     PISSN: 02649993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0264-9993(00)00055-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bhagwati, J., Protectionism, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1988.
2. Buffie E. On the condition for export-led growth. Can. J. Econ. 25:1992;211-225.
3. Darnell, C.A., A Dictionary of Econometrics, Edward Elgar, London, 1994.
4. Dickey D., Fuller W. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74:1979;427-431.
5. Diebold F., Rudebusch G. On the power of Dickey-Fuller tests against fractional alternatives. Econ. Lett. 35:1991;155-160.
6. Eithier W.J. National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 72:1982;389-405.
7. Engle R.F., Granger C.W. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica. 55:1987;251-276.
8. Feder G. On exports and economic growth. J. Dev. Econ. 12:1982;59-73.
9. Findlay, R., 'Growth and Development in Trade Models', in Handbook of International Economics, vol. 1, (eds.), R. Jones and P. Kenen. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1984.
10. Geweke J., Porter-Hudak S. The estimation and application of long memory time series models. J. Time Ser. Anal. 4:1983;221-238.
11. Grossman, G. and E. Helpman, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
12. Helpman, E., 'Growth, Technological Progress and Trade', NBER Working Paper No. 2592. Washington, 1988.
13. Helpman, E. and P. Krugman, Market Structure and Foreign Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.
14. Johansen S. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J. Econ. Dyn. Control. 12:1988;231-254.
15. Johansen S., Juselius K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration - with application to the demand for money. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 52:1990;169-210.
16. Jung W.S., Marshall P.J. Exports, growth and causality in developing countries. J. Dev. Econ. 18:1985;1-12.
17. Lucas R.E. On the mechanisms of economic development. J. Monet. Econ. 22:1988;3-42.
18. Marin D. Is the export-led growth hypothesis valid for industrialized countries? Rev. Econ. Stat. 74:1992;678-688.
19. Michaely M. Exports and growth: an empirical investigation. J. Dev. Econ. 40:1977;49-53.
20. Neves, J.C., The Portuguese Economy - A Picture in Figures, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, 1994.
21. Newey W., West K. A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica. 55:1987;703-708.
22. Nunes A., Mata E., Valério N. Portuguese economic growth, 1833-1985. J. Eur. Econ. Hist. 18:1989;291-330.
23. Oxley L. Cointegration, causality and export-led growth in Portugal, 1865-1985. Econ. Lett. 43:1993;163-166.
24. Pack H. Endogenous growth theory: intellectual appeal and empirical shortcomings. J. Econ. Perspect. 8:1994;55-72.
25. Phillips P., Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika. 75:1988;335-346.
26. Rivera-Batiz L., Romer P. Economic integration and endogenous growth. Q. J. Econ. 106:1991;531-556.
27. Romer P.M. Increasing returns and long-run growth. J. Polit. Econ. 94:1986;1002-1037.
28. Romer P. Endogenous technological change. J. Polit. Econ. 98:1990;71-102.
29. Segerstrom P., Anant T., Dinopoulos E. A Shumpeterian model of the product life cycle. Am. Econ. Rev. 80:1990;1077-1091.
30. Stock J., Watson M. Testing for common trends. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 83:1988;1097-1107.
31. Thornton J. Cointegration, causality and export-led growth in Mexico. Econ. Lett. 50:1996;413-416.
32. Toda H., Phillips P. Vector autoregressions and causality. Econometrica. 61:1993;1367-1393.
33. Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Q. J. Econ. 80:1996;190-207.