Assessment of vascular physiology of tumorous livers: Comparison of two different methods

Academic Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1021-1029

  Kapanen, Mika K ^a   Halavaara, Juha T ^b   Häkkinen, Anna Maija ^a  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b JORVI HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

CT; Liver; Perfusion; Tumors

Indexed keywords

IOHEXOL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BLOOD VOLUME; COMPARTMENT MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; GAMMA RADIATION; HEPATIC ARTERY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER TUMOR; NONHUMAN; PORTAL VEIN BLOOD FLOW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RABBIT; TUMOR BLOOD FLOW; TUMOR MODEL;

EID: 0042318598     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00292-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Halavaara JT, Hamberg LM, Leong FS, Hunter GJ, Gazelle GS, Wolf GL. Functional CT in the assessment of liver vasculas physiology. Acad Radiol 1996; 3:946-952.
2. Miles KA, Heyball MP, Dixon AK. Functional images of hepatic perfusion obtained with dynamic CT. Radiology 1993; 188:405-411.
3. Miles KA. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1991; 64:409-412.
4. Miles KA, Leggett DA, Kelley BB, Hayball MP, Sinnatamby R, Bunce I. In vivo assessment of neovascularization of liver metastases using perfusion CT. Br J Radiol 1998; 71:276-281.
5. Blomley MJK, Coulden R, Dawson P, et al. Liver perfusion studied with ultrafast CT. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1995; 19:424-433.
6. Bell SD, Peters AM. Measurement of blood flow from first pass radio-nuclide angiography: influence of bolus volume. Eur J Nucl Med 1991; 18:885-888.
7. Axel L. Tissue mean transit time from dynamic computed tomography by a simple deconvolution technique. Invest Radiol 1983; 18:94-99.
8. Cuenod CA, Leconte I, Siauve N, et al. Early changes in liver perfusion caused by occult metastases in rats: detection with quantitative CT. Radiol 2001; 218:556-561.
9. Cuenod CA, Leconte I, Siauve N, et al. Deconvolution technique for measuring tissue perfusion by dynamic CT: application to normal and metastatic liver. Acad Radiol 2002; 9:S205-211.
10. Hindmarsh T. Elimination of water-soluble contrast media from the subarachnoid space. Acta Radiol 1975 (suppl):346-347.
11. Starmer CF, Clark DO. Computer computations of cardiac output using the gamma function. J Appl Physiol 1970; 28:219-220.
12. Brix G, Bahner ML, Hoffman U, Horvath A, Schreiber W. Regional blood flow, capillary permeability, and compartmental volumes: measurement with dynamic CT-initial experience. Radiol 1999; 210:269-276.
13. Blomley MJK, Coulden R, Bufkin C, Lipton MJ, Dawson P. Contrast bolus dynamic computed tomography for the measurement of solid organ perfusion. Invest Radiol 1993; 28:S72-S77.
14. Berland LL, Lee JY. Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography. Invest Radiol 1988; 23:918-922.
15. Claussen CD, Banzer D, Pfretzschner C, Kalender WA, Schörner W. Bolus geometry and dynamics after intravenous contrast medium injection. Radiology 1984; 153:365-368.
16. Bader TR, Herneth AM, Blaicher W, et al. Hepatic perfusion after liver transplantation: noninvasive measurement with dynamic single-section CT. Radiology 1998; 209:129-134.
17. Platt JF, Francis IR, Ellis JH, Reige KA. Difference in global hepatic enhancement assessed by dynamic CT in normal subjects and patients with hepatic metastases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997; 21: 348-354.
18. Platt JF, Francis IR, Ellis JH, Reige KA. Liver metastases; early detection based on abnormal contrast material enhancement at dual-phase helical CT. Radiology 1997; 205:49-53.
19. Sheafor DH, Killius JS, Paulson EK, DeLong DM, Foti AM, Nelson RC. Hepatic parenchymal enhancement during triple-phase helical CT: can it be used to predict which patients with breast cancer will develop hepatic metastases. Radiology 2000; 214:875-880.
20. Mooteri S, Rubin D, Leurgans S, et al. Tumor angiogenesis in primary and metastatic colorectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39:1073-1080.
21. Gonda T, Ishida H, Yoshinaga K, Sugihara K. Microvasculature of small liver metastases in rats. J Surg Res 2000; 94:43-48.
22. Breedis C, Young G. The blood supply of neoplasms in the liver. Am J Pathol 1954; 30:969-985.
23. Ridge JA, Bading JR, Gelbard AS, et al. Perfusion of colorectal liver metastases: relative distribution from the hapatic artery and portal vein. Cancer 1987; 59:1547-1553.
24. Kan Z. Dynamic study of iodized oil in the liver and blood supply to hepatic tumors. Acta Radiol 1996; vol. 37, suppl 408.
25. Lassen NA. Cerebral transit of an intravascular tracer may allow measurement of regional blood volume but not regional flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metabol 1984; 4:633-634.
26. Bassingthwaighte JB, Goresky CA. In: Renkin EM, Michel CG, eds. Handbook of Physiology Section 2: The Cardiovascular System. Bethesda, Md: American Physiology Society, 1984; 549-626.
27. Lassen NA, Henriksen O, Sejrsen P. In: Shepherd JT, Abboud FM, eds. Handbook of Physiology Section 2: The Cardiovascular System. Bethesda, Md: American Physiology Society, 1984; 21-64.
28. Weisskoff RM, Chesler D, Boxerman JL, Rosen BR. Pitfalls in MR measurement of tissue blood flow with intravascular tracers: which mean transit time? Magn Reson Med 1993; 29:553-559.
29. Meier P, Zierler KL. On the theory of the indicator-dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. Appl Physiol 1954; 6:731-744.