A new family of genetic algorithms for wavelength interval selection in multivariate analytical spectroscopy

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 338-345

  Goicoechea, Héctor C ^a   Olivieri, Alejandro C ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL LITORAL   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Genetic algorithm; Multivariate calibration; Near and mid infrared spectroscopies; Partial least squares; Wavelength selection

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; GLUCOSE; INFRARED DEVICES; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; NEAR INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY;

ANALYTICAL SPECTROSCOPY; INTERVAL SELECTION; MID-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; MULTIVARIATE CALIBRATION; NEAR INFRARED; NEAR- AND MID-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; NEAR-INFRARED; NEW APPROACHES; PARTIAL LEAST-SQUARES; WAVELENGTH SELECTION;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

GASOLINE; GLUCURONIC ACID; OCTANE;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PARAMETER; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSOR; THEORETICAL MODEL;

EID: 0042318560     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.812     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bangalore AS, Shaffer RE, Small GW, Arnold MA. Genetic algorithm-based method for selecting wavelengths and model size for use with partial least-squares regression: application to near-infrared spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 1996; 68: 4200-4212.
2. McShane MJ, Cote GL, Spiegelman CH. Variable selection in multivariate calibration of a spectroscopic glucose sensor. Appl. Spectrosc. 1997; 51: 1559-1564.
3. Spiegelman CH, McShane MJ, Goetz MJ, Motamedi M, Yue QL, Cote GL. Theoretical justification of wavelength selection in PLS calibration: development of a new algorithm. Anal. Chem. 1998; 70: 35-44.
4. Jiang J-H, Berry RJ, Siesler HW, Ozaki Y. Wavelength interval selection in multicomponent spectral analysis by moving window partial least-squares regression with application to mid-infrared and near-infrared spectroscopic data. Anal. Chem. 2002; 74: 3555-3565.
5. Martens H, Naes T. Multivariate Calibration (2nd edn). Wiley: Chichester, 1989.
6. Thomson ML. Selection of variables in multiple regression. Int. Statist. Rev. 1978; 46: 1-19.
7. Collado MS, Mantovani VE, Goicoechea HC, Olivieri AC. Simultaneous spectrophotometric-multivariate calibration determination of several components of ophthalmic solutions: phenylephrine, chloramphenicol, antipyrine, methylparaben and thimerosal. Talanta 2000; 52: 909-920.
8. Goicoechea HC, Olivieri AC. Wavelength selection by net analyte signals calculated with the multivariate factor-based hybrid linear analysis (HLA). A theoretical and experimental comparison with partial least-squares (PLS). Analyst 1999; 124: 725-731.
9. Ding Q, Small GW, Arnold MA. Genetic algorithm-based wavelength selection for the near-infrared determination of glucose in biological matrixes: initialization strategies and effects of spectral resolution. Anal. Chem. 1998; 70: 4472-4479.
10. Swierenga H, Wülfert F, de Noord OE, de Weijer AP, Smilde AK, Buydens LMC. Development of robust calibration models in near infra-red spectrometric applications. Anal. Chim. Acta 2000; 411: 121-135.
11. Todeschini R, Galvani D, Vilchez JL, del Olmo M, Navas N. Kohonen artificial neural networks as a tool for wavelength selection in multicomponent spectrofluorimetric PLS modelling: application to phenol, o-cresol, m-cresol and p-cresol mixtures. Trends Anal. Chem. 1999; 18: 93-98.
12. Leardi R. Genetic algorithms in chemometrics and chemistry: a review. J. Chemometrics 2001; 15: 559-569.
13. Ferré J, Rius FX. Detection and correction of biased results of individual analytes in multicomponent spectroscopic analysis. Anal. Chem. 1998; 70: 1999-2007.
14. Ugulino Araújo MC, Bezerra Saldanha TC, Harrop Galvão RK, Yoneyama T, Caldas Chame H, Visani V. The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001; 57: 65-73.
15. Davis L. Genetic Algorithm and Simulated Annealing. Pitman: London, 1987.
16. Goldberg DE. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1988.
17. Leardi R. Application of genetic algorithm-PLS for feature selection in spectral data sets. J. Chemometrics 2000; 14: 643-655.
18. Broadhurst D, Goodacre R, Jones A, Rowland JJ, Kell DB. Genetic algorithms as a method for variable selection in PLS regression with applications to pyrolysis mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1997; 348: 71-86.
19. Da Costa Filho PA, Poppi RJ. Aplicação de algoritmos genéticos na seleção de variáveis em espectroscopia no infravermelho médio. Determinação simultânea de glicose, maltose e frutose. Quim. Nova 2002; 25: 46-52.
20. Hasegawa K, Kimura T, Funatsu K. GA strategy for variable selection in QSAR studies: enhancement of comparative molecular binding energy analysis by GA-based PLS method. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1999; 18: 262-272.
21. Guo Q, Wu W, Massart DL, Boucon C, de Jong S. Feature selection in principal component analysis of analytical data. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002; 61: 123-132.
22. Ros F, Pintore M, Chrétien JR. Molecular descriptor selection combining genetic algorithms and fuzzy logic: application to database mining procedures. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002; 63: 15-26.
23. Barros AS, Rutledge DN. Genetic algorithm applied to the selection of principal components. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 1998; 40: 65-81.
24. Shaffer RE, Small GW. Learning optimization from nature. Genetic algorithms and simulated annealing. Anal. Chem. 1997; 69: 236A-242A.
25. Goicoechea HC, Olivieri AC. Wavelength selection for multivariate calibration using a genetic algorithm: a novel initialization strategy. J. Chem. Info. Comput. Sci. 2002; 42: 1146-1153.
26. Haaland DM, Thomas EV. Partial least-squares methods for spectral analyses. 1. Relation to other quantitative calibration methods and the extraction of qualitative information. Anal. Chem. 1988; 60: 1193-1202.
27. Green RL, Kalivas JH. Graphical diagnostics for regression model determinations with consideration of the bias/variance trade-off. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002; 60: 173-188.
28. Frank GW. Kombucha - Healthy Beverage and Natural Remedy from the Far East. Ennsthaler: Steyr, 1993; 19-46.
29. Goicoechea HC, Eluk D, Kubescha M, Ferraro J, Miglietta H, Rodil B, Mantovani V. Probiotics production: an interesting example for the undergraduate analytical chemistry laboratory. Chem. Educ. 2000; 5: 67-70.
30. Kimura-Takagi I, Nagaoka M, Shibata H, Hashimoto S, Ueyama S, Aiyama R, Yokokura T. Determination of glucuronic acid containing fucoidan from liquid chromatography with pre-column fluorescence derivatization. Chromatography 2001; 22: 85-90.
31. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 05.05. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, 1999.
32. Matlab 5.3. The MathWorks Inc.: Natick, MA, 1999.
33. Faber K, Kowalski BR. Propagation of measurement errors for the validation of predictions obtained by principal component regression and partial least squares. J. Chemometrics 1997; 11: 181-238.
34. Kelly JJ, Barlow CH, Jinguji TM, Callis JB. Prediction of gasoline octane number from near-infrared spectral features in the range 660-1215 nm. Anal. Chem. 1989; 61: 313-320.
35. Bohács G, Ovádi Z, Salgó A. Prediction of gasoline properties with near infrared spectroscopy. J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 1998; 6: 341-348.
36. Chung H, Lee H, Jun C-H. Determination of research octane number using NIR spectral data and ridge regression. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2001; 22: 37-42.