AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF OBJECT CLASS DESCRIPTIONS USING SYMBOLIC LEARNING TECHNIQUES

Proceedings of the 9th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 1991

Volumn 2, Issue , 1991, Pages 710-717

  Cromwell, R L ^a   Kak, A C ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

AUTOMATIC GENERATION; COMPLICATED DOMAIN; DESCRIPTION SETS; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; LEARNING TECHNIQUES; OBJECT CLASS; OBJECTS RECOGNITION; PROBLEM DOMAIN; SCENE DESCRIPTION; SYMBOLIC LEARNING;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 0042315010     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bairn, P. W. 1988. A Method for Attribute Selection in inductive Learning Systems. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 10(6):888-896.
2. Bolles, R. C, and Horaud, P. 1986. 3DPO: A three dimensional part orientation system. International Journal of Robotics Research, 5(3):3-26.
3. Chen, C. H., and Kak, A. C. 1989. A robot vision system for recognizing 3-D objects in low-order polynomial time. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 19(6): 1535-1563.
4. Dietterich, T. G., and Michalski, R. S. 1979. Learning and Generalization of Characteristic Descriptions: Evaluation Criteria and Comparative Review of Selected Methods. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 223-231. Tokyo: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Inc.
5. Dietterich, T. G., and Michalski, R. S. 1981. Inductive Learning of Structural Descriptions: Evaluation Criteria and Comparative Review of Selected Methods. Artificial Intelligence 16(3):257-294.
6. Faugeras, O. D., and Hebert, M. 1986. The Representation, Recognition, and Location of 3-D Objects. The International Journal of Robotics Research 5(3):27-52.
7. Crimson, W. E. L., and Lozano-Perez, T. 1984. Model-Based Recognition and Localization from Sparse Range or Tactile Data. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 3(3):3-35.
8. Hansen, C. and Henderson, T. 1988. Toward the Automatic Generation of Recognition Strategies. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Vision, 275-279. Tampa FL: IEEE Computer Society.
9. Hayes-Roth, F. and McDermott, J. 1977. Knowledge Acquisition from Structural Descriptions. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 356-362. Cambridge MA: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Inc.
10. Hayes-Roth, F. and McDermott, J., 1978. An Interference Matching Technique for Inducing Abstractions. Communications ACM, 21(5):401-410.
11. Ikeuchi, K., and Kanade, T. 1988. Applying Sensor Models to Automatic Generation of Object Recognition Programs. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Vision, 228-237. Tampa FL: IEEE Computer Society.
12. Kim, W. Y., and Kak, A. C. 1991. 3-D Object Recognition Using Bipartite Matching Embedded in Discrete Relaxation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(3):224-251.
13. Michalski, R. S. 1980. Pattern Recognition as Rule-Guided Inductive Inference. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2(4):349-361.
14. Oshima, M., and Shirai, Y. 1983. Object recognition using three-dimensional Information. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 5(4):353-361.
15. Vere, S. A. 1975. Induction of Concepts in the Predicate Calculus. In Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 281-287. Tbilisi, USSR: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Inc.
16. Vere, S. A. 1977. Induction of Relational Productions in the Presence of Background Information. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 349-355. Cambridge MA: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Inc.