First principles determinations of magnetostriction in transition metals (invited)

Journal of Applied Physics

Volumn 79, Issue 8 PART 2B, 1996, Pages 6209-6212

  Wu, Ruqian ^a   Freeman, A J ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042290910     PISSN: 00218979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.362073     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. S. W. Sun and R. C. O'Handley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2798 (1991).
2. G. Bochi, O. Song, and R. C. O'Handley, Phys. Rev. B 50, 2043 (1994).
3. H. Takahashi, S. Tsunashima, S. Iwata, and S. Uchiyama, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 126, 282 (1993).
4. G. Bochi, C. A. Ballentine, H. E. Inglefield, C. V. Thompson, and R. C. O'Handley, Phys. Rev. Lett. (submitted).
5. R. Zuberek, H. Szymczak, R. Krishnan, and Tessier, J. Phys. C 8, 1761 (1988).
6. J. R. Cullen, A. E. Clark, and K. B. Hathaway, in Materials Science and Technology, edited by R. W. Cahn, P. Haasen, and E. J. Kramer (Weinhein, New York, 1991), Vol. IIIB, p. 529.
7. D. S. Wang, R. Q. Wu, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 869 (1993).
8. X. D. Wang, R. Q. Wu, D. S. Wang, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B (to be published).
9. E. Wimmer, H. Krakauer, M. Weinert, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 24, 864 (1981); M. Weinert, E. Wimmer, and A. J. Freeman, ibid. 26, 4571 (1982), and references therein.
10. E. Wimmer, H. Krakauer, M. Weinert, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 24, 864 (1981); M. Weinert, E. Wimmer, and A. J. Freeman, ibid. 26, 4571 (1982), and references therein.
11. M. Weinert, R. E. Watson, and J. W. Davenport, Phys. Rev. B 32, 2115 (1985).
12. X. D. Wang, D. S. Wang, R. Q. Wu, and A. J. Freeman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. (in press).
13. J. G. Gay and R. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2728 (1986); R. Richter and J. G. Gay, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 151, 3 (1989).
14. J. G. Gay and R. Richter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2728 (1986); R. Richter and J. G. Gay, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 151, 3 (1989).
15. P. Strange, J. B. Staunton, B. L. Gyorffy, and H. Ebert, Physica B 172, 51 (1991).
16. G. H. O. Daalderrop, P. J. Kelly, and M. F. H. Schuurmans, Phys. Rev. B 41, 11919 (1990).
17. D. S. Wang, R. Q. Wu, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 47, 14932 (1993).
18. D. S. Wang, R. Q. Wu, and A. J. Freeman, Phys. Rev. B 48, 15883 (1993).
19. D. S. Wang, R. Q. Wu, and A. J. Freeman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 129, 327 (1994).
20. A 5%-10% uncertainty may be involved since the MCA energy for l=3.16 is away from the trend due to the effects of the surface pair coupling (SPC), i.e., the MCA energy changes from -0.14 meV/adatom to -0.09 meV/adatom when the SPC is dropped. Although these effects also appear to be not negligible for some k-points in Fig. 2, we found that the elimination of SPC affects the MCA energies only very slightly (<0.01 eV/adatom) for other geometries for Co/Cu(001).
21. C. Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics (Wiley New York, 1996), 7th ed. p. 482.
22. R. A. Lukaszew and R. Naik, 40th CMMM abstract BC-13, 80 (1995).
23. R. C. O'Handley (private communication).