The character of deliberation: Equality, argument, and the formation of public opinion

International Journal of Public Opinion Research

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 239-264

  Dutwin, David ^a,b  

^a International Communications Research   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042286863     PISSN: 09542892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Auld, F., Jr., & White, A. M. (1956). Rules for dividing interviews into sentences. Journal of Psychology, 42, 273-281.
2. Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
3. Benhabib, S. (1996). Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. Bessette, J. M. (1994). The mild voice of reason: Deliberative democracy and American national government. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
5. Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Carey, J. W. (1996). The press, public opinion, and public discourse. In. T. L. Glasser & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 373-402). NY: Guilford Press.
7. Ceci, S. J., & Liker, J. K. (1986). Academic and nonacademic intelligence: An experimental separation. In. R. J. Sternberg & R. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence (pp. 119-142). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Cohen, J. (1997). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In J. Bohman & W. Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics (pp. 67-92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Dewey, J. F. (1927/1954). The public and its problems. Denver, CO: A. Swallow.
11. Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. NY: Oxford University Press.
12. Dutwin, D. (2001). Can people talk politics? A study of deliberative democracy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg School for Communication.
13. Emler, N. (1990). A social psychology of reputation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, Vol. 1. (pp. 171-193). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
14. Emler, N., & Frazer, E. (1999). Politics: The education effect. Oxford Review of Education, 25, 251-273.
15. Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Deliberation and democracy: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Fishkin, J. S. (1995). The voice of the people: Public opinion and democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Fishkin, J. S. (1996). The televised deliberative poll: An experiment in democracy. The American Annals of Political and Social Science, 546, 132-140.
18. Fishkin, J. S., & Luskin, R. C. (1999). Bringing deliberation to the democratic dialogue. In M. McCombs & A. Reynolds (Eds.), The poll with a human face: The National Issues Convention experiment in political communication (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Galotti, K. (1989). Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 331-351.
20. Gunderson, A. G. (2000). The Socratic citizen: A theory of deliberative democracy. NY: Lexington Books.
21. Gutmann, A. (1993). The disharmony of democracy. In J. W. Chapman & I. Shapiro (Eds.), Democratic community (pp. 126-162). NY: New York University Press.
22. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement: Why moral conflict cannot be avoided in politics, and what should be done about it. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
23. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2000). Why deliberative democracy is different. Social Philosophy and Policy, 17, 161-180.
24. Habermas, J. (1962/1993). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Hans, V. P., & Vidmaar, N. J. (1986). Judging the jury. NY: Longman.
26. Hastie, R. S., Penrod, S., & Pennington, N. (1983). Inside the jury. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Hatfield, J. D., & Weider-Hatfield, D. (1978). The comparative utility of three types of behavioral units for interaction analysis. Communication Monographs, 45, 44-50.
28. Judd, C. M., & Krosnick, J. (1989). The structural basis of consistency among political attitudes: Effects of political expertise and attitude importance. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 99-128). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Kim, J., Wyatt, R. O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361-385.
30. Knight, J., & Johnson, J. (1994). Aggregation and deliberation: On the possibility of democratic legitimacy. Political Theory, 22, 277-296.
31. Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, Jan (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. CA: Sage.
32. Krosnick, J., & Telhami, S. (1995). Public attitudes toward Israel: A study of the attentive and issue publics. International Studies Quarterly, 39, 535-554.
33. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. NY: Cambridge University Press.
34. Lalljee, M., & Evans, G. (1998). Political talk and the stability and consistency of political orientation. Social Cognition, 8, 49-72.
35. Lane, R. E., & Sears, D. O. (1964). Public opinion. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
36. Lasch, C. (1995). The revolt of the elites and the betrayal of democracy. NY: Norton.
37. Lasorsa, D. L. (1991). Political outspokenness: Factors working against the spiral of silence. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 131-140.
38. Manin, B. (1987). On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory, 13, 338-368.
39. Mansbridge, J. J. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago.
40. Marsden, N. (1987). Gender dynamics and jury deliberations. Yale Law Journal, 96, 593-612.
41. McLeod, J. M., Daily, K., Guo, Z., Eveland, W. P., Jr., Bayer, J., Yang, S., & Wang, H. (1996). Community integration, local media use, and democratic processes. Communication Research, 23, 179-209.
42. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16, 315-336.
43. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E. M., Holbert, R. L., Zhang, W., Zubric, S., & Zubric, J. (1999). Understanding deliberation: The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum. Communication Research, 26, 743-774.
44. Meyers, R. A., & Brashers, D. E. (1998). Argument in group decision making: Explicating a process model and investigating the argument-outcome link. Communication Monographs, 65, 261-281.
45. Meyers, R. A., Brashers, D. E., & Haner, J. (2000). Majority-minority influence: Identifying argumentative patterns and predicting argument-outcome links. Journal of Communication, 50, 3-29.
46. Meyers, R. A., Seibold, D. R., & Brashers, D. (1991). Argument in initial group decision-making discussions: Refinement of a coding scheme and a descriptive quantitative analysis. Western Journal of Communication, 55, 47-68.
47. Murray, E. J. (1956). A content analysis method for studying psychotherapy. Psychological Monographs, 70 (13), 1-31.
48. O'Keefe, B. J., & Delia, J. G. (1979). Construct comprehensiveness and cognitive complexity as predictors of the number and strategic adaptation of arguments and
49. Paul, R. (1992). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
50. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
51. Perkins, D. N. (1985). Postprimary education has little impact on informal reasoning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 562-571.
52. Perkins, D. N., Allen, R., & Haffner, J. (1983). Difficulties in everyday reasoning. In W. Maxwell & J. Bruner (Eds.), Thinking: The expanding frontier (pp. 177-190). Philadelphia, PA: The Franklin Institute Press.
53. Price, V. (1992). Public opinion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54. Price, V., & Roberts, D. F. (1987). Public opinion processes. In C. R. Berger & S. H. Chaffee (Eds.), Handbook of Communication Science (pp. 781-816). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55. Robinson, J. P., & Levy, M. R. (1986). The main source: Learning from television news. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56. Sanders, L. M. (1997) Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25, 347-376.
57. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
58. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Deliberation or dispute? An exploratory study examining dimensions of public opinion expression. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 11, 25-58.
59. Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62.
60. Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowistz (Ed.), Advances in social psychology (pp. 289-338). NY: Academic Press.
61. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Nie, N. H. (1993). Citizen activity: Who participates? What do they say? American Political Science Review, 87, 303-318.
63. Wagner, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Tacit knowledge and intelligence in the everyday world. In. R. J. Sternberg & R. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence (pp. 51-83). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
64. Walton, D. N. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.
65. Wegman, C. (1994). Factual argumentation in private opinions: Effects of rethorical context and involvement, Text, 14, 287-312.
66. Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference (pp. 120-137). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67. Yuan, Y. C. (2000). Multiple imputation for missing data: Concepts and new development. Rockville, MD: SAS Institute.
68. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. NY: Cambridge University Press.