Binocular fusion in Panum's limiting case of stereopsis obeys the uniqueness constraint

Science in China, Series C: Life Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 40-48

  Wang, Zhihong ^a   Wu, Xinnian ^a   Ni, Rui ^a   Wang, Yunjiu ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Correspondence problem; Orientation disparity; Panum's limiting case; Psychophysics; Uniqueness constraint; Visual direction

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042281672     PISSN: 10069305     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02882071     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Marr, D., Vision, San Francisco: W. H., Freeman and Company, 1982.
2. Whealstone, C., Contributions to the physiology of vision (I) - On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1838, 128: 371.
3. Panuni, P. L., Physiologische Untersuchungen über das Sehen mit zwei Augen, Kiel: Schwersse Buchhandlung, 1858.
4. Gillam, B., Blackburn, S., Cook, M., Panum's limiting case: double fusion, convergence error, or "da Vinci stereopsis", Perception, 1995, 24: 333.
5. Kumar, T., Multiple matching of features in simple stereograms, Vision Research, 1996, 5: 675.
6. Westheimer, G., Panum's phenomenon and the confluence of signals from the two eyes in stereoscopy, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 1986, 228: 289.
7. Nakayama, K., Shimojo, S., Da Vinci stereopsis: depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points, Vision Research, 1990, 30: 1811.
8. Ono, H., Shimono, K., Shibula, K., Occlusion as a depth cue in the Wheatstone-Panum limiting case. Perception & Psychophysics, 1992, 51: 3.
9. Chang, J. J., Anderson, B. L., Julesz, B., Panum limiting case exhibits greatest stability and clearest depth when consistent with the geometry of occlusion, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 1993, 34: 1438.
10. Blackburn, S., Cook, M., Gillam, B., Occlusion da Vinci stereopsis does not explain Panum's limiting case, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 1995, 36: S369.
11. Howard, I. P., Ohmi, M., A new interpretation of the role of dichoptic occlusion in stereopsis, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (ARVO Abstracts), 1992, 33: 1370.
12. Howard, I. P., Rogers, B., Binocular vision and stereopsis, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
13. Shimono, K., Tam, W. J., Nakamizo, S., Wheatstone-Panum limiting case: occlusion, camouflage, and vergence-induced disparity cues, Perception & Psychophysics, 1999, 61: 445.
14. Nakamizo, S., Shimono, K., Kondo, M. et al., Visual directions of two stimuli in Panum's limiting case, Perception, 1994, 23: 1037.
15. Ono, H., Map, A. P., A restatement and modification of Wells-Hering's laws of visual direction, Perception, 1995, 24: 237.
16. McKee, S. P., Bravo, M. J., Smallman, H. S. et al., The 'uniqueness constraint' and binocular masking, Perception, 1995, 24: 49.