Academic freedom, promotion, reappointment, tenure and the administrative use of student evaluation of faculty: (Part II). Views from the court

Education Policy Analysis Archives

Volumn 5, Issue , 1997, Pages

  Haskell, Robert E ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042259648     PISSN: 10682341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Allegre, M., and Guista, M. (1993). What every English teacher ought to know about using student evaluations. Teaching English in the Two-year College, 20(1), 57-63.
2. Baez, B, and Centra, J. (1995). Tenure, promotion, and reappointment: Legal and administrative implications. Ashe-eric Higher Education Report, No. 1.
3. Barnett, L.D. (1996). Are teaching evaluation questionnaires valid? Assessing the evidence. Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector, 25(4), 335-349.
4. Benson, D.E., and Lewis, J.M. (1994). Students' evaluation of teaching and accountability: Implications from the Boyer and the ASA reports. Teaching Sociology, 22, 195-99.
5. Blum, D.E. (1990, October 3). U. of Guam removes evaluations from files. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Section: Personal & Professional, A21.
6. Bonetti, S. (1994). On the use of student questionnaires. Higher Education Review, 26, 57-64.
7. Brian Maclean v. President of The University of British Columbia (1991). Held at Vancouver, B.C. January 28-June 20.
8. Carey, G. W. (1993). Thoughts on the lesser evil: Student evaluations. Perspectives on Political Science, 22, 17-20.
9. Carley V. Arizona Board of Regents, 737 P.2d 1099 (Ariz. App. 1987).
10. Cashin, W. E. (1995). Student ratings of teaching: The research revisited. IDEA Paper No. 32. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
11. Christopher Turner v. The President of the University of British Columbia (1993). Arbitration Appeals Board Case No.: AI-256 Vancouver, B.C. July 19, 20 and 21.
12. The Chronicle of Higher Education. (1994a, April 27). State calls for release of faculty evaluations, p. A4
13. The Chronicle of Higher Education. (1994b, December 14). Faculty evaluations to go on line at u. of Texas at Austin, p. A21
14. Chuen Wei and the Vermont State Colleges Faculty Federation, 18 VLRB 261 (1995)
15. Copeland, J.D. and Murry, J. W., Jr. (1996). Getting tossed from the ivory tower. Missouri Law Review, 61, 233-327.
16. Crumbley, L.D., and Fliedner, E. (1995). Accounting administrators' perceptions of student evaluation of teaching (SET) information. Manuscript, Department of Accounting, Texas A&M University.
17. Cynthia J. Fisher v. Vassar College (1995). United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Nos. 1179, 1303, 2275 Docket Nos. 94-7737, 94-7785, 94-9125
18. Damron, J.C. (1996). Instructor personality and the politics of the classroom. Manuscript, Douglas College, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada V3L 5B2. (An Earlier Version in the June 1994 Issue of Faculty Matters (No. 5, Pages 9-12) and the September, 1994 Issue of Update (The Newsletter of the Okanagan University College Faculty Association). Available online at http://vax1.mankato.msus.edu/∼pkbrandon/Damron_politics.html
19. Damron, (1997). Personal communication.
20. Dershowitz, A. (1994). Contrary to popular opinion. New York: Berkeley Books.
21. Dyson V. Lavery, 417 F.supp. 103 (E.d. Va. 1976).
22. Evaluating teacher evaluations. (1996). This article submitted by glen9579@novell@uidaho.edu on 11/12/96. http://marsquadra.tamu.edu/TIG/Forum. html. (See, Topical Interest Group:Assessment in Higher Education at http://marsquadra.tamu.edu/TIG/GeneralArticles/evaluatingteacherevaluations.ht)
23. Fields V. Clark University, Civil Action No. 80-1011-s, United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 40 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (Bna) 670, March 14, 1986; Vacated and Remanded May 8, 1987.
24. Furedy, John J. (1995). Academic freedom, opinions and acts: The voltaire-mill perspective applied to current canadian cases University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 44, 131-4.
25. Goldman, L. (1993). On the erosion of education and the eroding foundations of teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 20 (Spring), 57-64.
26. Greenwald, A.G. (1996). Applying social psychology to reveal a major (but correctable) flaw in student evaluations of teaching. University of Washington, Draft Manuscript, March 1, submitted for publication.
27. Greenwald, A., and Gillmore, G. (1997). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instructions. Journal of Educational Psychology (forthcoming).
28. Haskell, R.E. (1997). Academic freedom, tenure, and student evaluation of faculty: Galloping polls in the 21st century. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5(6), [Refereed Online Journal] Available: http://olam.ed.asu.edu/ epaa/v5n6.html
29. Husbands, C., and Fosh, P. (1993). Student's evaluation of teaching in higher education: Experiences from four European countries and some implication of the practice. Assessment & Evaluation on Higher Education, 18, 95-114
30. Johnson V. University of Pittsburgh, 435 F.supp. 1328 (W.d. Pa. 1977).
31. Kaplin, W.A. (1997). Personal communication. January 20th, School of Law, Catholic University of America.
32. Kaplin, W.A., and Lee, B. (1995). The law of higher education: A comprehensive guide to legal implications of administrative decision making (3rd Ed). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
33. Kemp, B.W., and Kuman, G.S. (1990). Student evaluations: Are we using them correctly? Journal of Education for Business, 65, (November/December). 106-11.
34. Lieberman V. Grant, 474 F.supp. 848 (D.conn. 1979).
35. Lovelace v. Southeastern Massachusetts University, 793 F.2d 419 (1st Cir.1986).
36. Marsh, H.W. (1984). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707-754.
37. Parini, J. (1995, July 14). Tenure and the loss of faculty talent. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Section: Opinion, POV.
38. Peters V Middlebury College, 409 F.supp. 857 (D. Vt. 1977).
39. Poch, R.K. (1993). Academic freedom in American higher education: Rights, responsibilities, and limitations. Ashe-eric Higher Education Report No. 4.
40. Renner, R.R. (1981). Comparing professors: How student ratings contribute to the decline in quality of higher education. Phi Delta Kappan, 63, (2 Oct.), 128-30.
41. Robert Kramer v. The President of the University of British Columbia (1992). Arbitration Appeals Board Case No. AI-245. Held at the University April 22 and 23.
42. Scriven, Michael. (1988). The new crisis in teacher evaluation: The improper use of 'research-based' indicators. Professional Personnel Evaluation News. (January) p.4.
43. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation Thesaurus. (4th Ed.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
44. Scriven, M. (1993). The validity of student ratings: In teacher evaluation. Evaluation & Development Group.
45. Scriven, M. (1995). A unified theory approach to teacher evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 21, 111-129
46. Seldin, P. (1993, July 21). When students rate professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Opinion p. POV.
47. Stone, J.E. (1995). Inflated grades, inflated enrollment, and inflated budgets: An analysis and call for review at the state level. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 3, Number 11 (2075) [Online] Available: http://olam.ed.asu. edu/epaa/v3n11.html
48. University of Regina V. University of Regina Faculty Association and Dr. Pradeep Jalan (1993). Case No.: AI-298 Regina, Saskatchewan, July 9.
49. Weeks, K. M. (1996). Managing departments: Chairpersons and the law. Nashville, Tennessee: College Legal Information, Inc.
50. William Sypher v. Vermont State Colleges Faculty Federation, 5 VLRB 102 (1982).
51. Young, R. D. (1993). Student evaluation of faculty: A faculty perspective. Perspectives on Political Science, 22, 12-16.
52. Yunker, B.J., and Sterner, J (1988). A survey of faculty performance evaluation in accounting. Accounting Educators' Journal, (Fall). 63-74.
53. Zirkel, P.A. (1996). The law of teacher evaluation. Bloomington, In: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.