Dynamics of proton transfer in mesoscopic clusters

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 104, Issue 12, 1996, Pages 4581-4590

  Consta, Styliani ^a   Kapral, Raymond ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042240124     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.471153     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. See, for example, A. W. Castleman, Jr. and R. G. Keesee, Science 241, 36 (1988);
2. R. G. Keesee and A. W. Castleman, Jr., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 15, 1011 (1986);
3. R. Naamen, Adv. Chem. Phys. 70, 181 (1988);
4. H.-P. Kaukonen, U. Landman, and C. L. Cleveland, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 4997 (1991), and references therein;
5. D. Laria and R. Fernández-Prini, Chem. Phys. Lett. 205, 260 (1993);
6. D. Laria and R. Fernández-Prini, J. Chem. Phys. (to be published);
7. Reaction Dynamics in Clusters and Condensed Phases, edited by J. Jortner et al. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994).
8. D. Wei and D. Salahub, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 7633 (1994).
9. R. Knochenmuss, G. Holtom, and D. Ray, Chem. Phys. Lett. 215, 188 (1993).
10. S. Consta and R. Kapral, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 10908 (1994).
11. D. Laria, G. Ciccotti, M. Ferrario, and R. Kapral, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 378 (1992).
12. D. Laria, G. Ciccotti, M. Ferrario, and R. Kapral, Chem. Phys. 180, 181 (1994).
13. D. Li and G. Voth, J. Phys. Chem. 95, 10425 (1991).
14. D. Borgis and J. T. Hynes, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 3619 (1991);
15. D. Borgis, G. Tarjus, and H. Azzouz, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 3188 (1992);
16. D. Borgis, G. Tarjus, H. Azzouz, J. Phys. Chem. ibid. 97, 1390 (1993);
17. H. Azzouz and D. Borgis, J. Phys. Chem. ibid. 98, 7361 (1993).
18. S. Hammes-Schiffer and J. C. Tully, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 4657 (1994).
19. See, for instance, M. D. Joesten and L. J. Schaad, Hydrogen Bonding (Marcel Deckker, New York, 1974).
20. J. C. Tully, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 1061 (1990);
21. J. C. Tully, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Quantum Chem. Symp. 25, 299 (1991).
22. L. Verlet, Phys. Rev. 159, 98 (1967).
23. J. P. Ryckaert, G. Ciccotti, and H. J. C. Berendsen, J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327 (1977).
24. S. Nosé, Mol. Phys. 52, 255 (1984);
25. W. G. Hoover, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695 (1985).
26. R. A. Marcus and N. Sutin, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 811 265 (1985).
27. A. Warshel J. Am. Chem. Soc. 86, 2218 (1982).
28. T. Yamamoto, J. Chem. Phys. 33, 281 (1960);
29. D. Chandler, J. Chem. Phys 68, 2959 (1978).
30. E. Carter, G. Ciccotti, J. T. Hynes, and R. Kapral, Chem. Phys. Lett. 156, 472 (1989).
31. M. Gillan, J. Phys. C 20, 3621 (1987);
32. G. A. Voth, D. Chandler and W. H. Miller, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 7749 (1989).
33. A. S. Clarke, R. Kapral, B. Moore, G. Patey, and X.-G. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3283 (1993);
34. A. S. Clarke, R. Kapral, and G. Patey, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 2432 (1994).
35. The quantity n* shows more reliably the location of the complex in the cluster than the distance d. For instance, in Fig. 4 in the vicinity of 2.6 ns the values of d suggest that the complex is inside the cluster while the values of n* suggest that the complex is on the surface. Apart from such infrequent discrepancies, in our simulations the conclusions drawn from both indicators are generally the same.
36. G. Ciccotti and J. P. Ryckaert, Comput. Phys. Rep. 4, 345 (1986).
37. H. C. Andersen, J. Comput. Phys. 52, 24 (1983).