Interorganizational Relationships among Nonprofits in the Aftermath of Welfare Reform

Social Work

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 307-319

  Reisch, Michael ^a   Sommerfeld, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Advocacy; Collaboration; Interorganizational relationships; Nonprofit organizations; Welfare reform

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COOPERATION; ECONOMICS; EMPLOYMENT; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POVERTY; SOCIAL CARE; SOCIAL WELFARE; SOCIAL WORK; UNITED STATES;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EMPLOYMENT; HUMANS; MICHIGAN; ORGANIZATIONS, NONPROFIT; POVERTY; PUBLIC ASSISTANCE; SOCIAL WELFARE; SOCIAL WORK; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0042236480     PISSN: 00378046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sw/48.3.307     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abramovitz, M. (1998). Regulating the lives of women: U.S. social policy from colonial times to the present (2nd ed.). Boston: South End Press.
2. Abramovitz, M. (2002). In jeopardy: The impact of welfare reform on nonprofit human service organizations in New York City. New York: United Way of America.
3. Administration for Children and Families. (2000a). Change in TANF caseloads. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
4. Administration for Children and Families. (2000b). Characteristics and financial circumstances of TANF recipients: Fiscal year 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
5. Alexander, J. (2000). Adaptive strategies of nonprofit human service organizations in an era of devolution and new public management. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 10, 287-303.
6. Allen, K., & Kirby, M. (2000). Unfinished business: Why cities matter to welfare reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
7. Bailey, D., & Koney, K. M. (1996). Interorganizational community-based collaboratives: A strategic response to shape the social work agenda. Social Work, 41, 602-612.
8. Baker, S., & Doorne-Huiskes, A. van (Eds.). (1999). Women and public policy: The shifting boundaries between the public and private spheres. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
9. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
10. Besharov, D. J., Germanis, P., & Rossi, P. H. (1997). Evaluating welfare reform: A guide for scholars and practitioners. College Park: University of Maryland.
11. Bielefeld, W. (1996). The institutionalization of nonprofit human service delivery: The role of political culture, administration and society. Administration and Society, 28, 362-389.
12. Bielefeld, W., & Scotch, R. (1998). The decision-making context and its impact on local human service nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 9(1), 53-69.
13. Bischoff, U. (2001). The impact of welfare reform on interorganizational relationships among nonprofit organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
14. Bischoff, U., & Reisch, M. (2000). The impact of welfare reform on community-based non-profit organizations: Implications for policy, practice, and education. Journal of Community Practice 8(4), 69-92.
15. Bloom, D. (1997). After AFDC: Welfare-to-work choices and challenges for states. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
16. Brown, A. (1997). Work first: How to implement an employment-focused approach to welfare reform. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
17. Brunner, L. (1996, February 5). States, nonprofits shoulder welfare reform burden. Christianity Today, 40, 100-101.
18. Burt, M., Pindus, N., & Capizzano, J. (2000). The social safety net at the beginning of federal welfare reform: Organization of and access to social services for low-income families. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
19. Carnochan, S., & Austin, M. (1999, September). Implementing welfare reform and guiding organizational change. Berkeley, CA: Bay Area Social Services Consortium.
20. Cnaan, R., Wineburg, R., & Boddie, S. (1999). The newer deal: Social work and religion in partnership. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. DiPadova, L. (2000). Utah's charitable organizations face welfare reform: Concerns of charitable leaders. Sale Lake City: Center for Public Policy and Administration.
22. Drum, T. (2000). Key economic indicators. Lansing: Michigan Family Independence Agency.
23. Eisinger, P. (1999). Food pantries and welfare reform: Estimating the effect. Focus, 20(3), 23-28.
24. Etzioni, A. (1996). The responsive community: A communitarian perspective. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 1-11.
25. Figueira-McDonough, J. (1995). Community organization and the underclass: Exploring new practice directions. Social Service Review, 69, 57-85.
26. Hasenfeld, Y. (1992). The nature of human service organizations. In Y. Hasenfeld (Ed.), Human services as complex organizations (pp. 3-23). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
27. Hassett, S., & Austin, M. J. (1997). Service integration: Something old and something new. Administration in Social Work, 21(3/4), 9-29.
28. Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Michigan Family Independence Agency. (2000). Assistance payments statistics. Lansing: Author.
30. Perlmutter, F. (1997). From welfare to work: Corporate initiatives and welfare reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, P. L. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105.
32. Quadagno, J. (1994). The color of welfare: How racism undermined the war on poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Reitan, T. (1998). Theories of interorganizational relations in the human services. Social Service Review, 72, 285-309.
34. Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Population statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
36. Warren, R. (1970). The good community: What would it be? Journal of the Community Development Society, 1(1), 14-24.
37. Withorn, A. (1999). Worrying about welfare reform: Community-based agencies respond. Boston: Boston Area Academics Working Group on Poverty.
38. Young, D. (1999). Complementary, supplementary, or adversarial? A theoretical and historical examination of nonprofit-government relations in the United States. In E. Boris & E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofits and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 31-67). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.