Psychologic and the study of memory

Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 4 SUPPL., 1999, Pages 3-17

  Smedslund, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042236181     PISSN: 00365564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1999.tb01435.x     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Anderson, M. C. & Neely, J. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. In: Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.) (1996). 'Memory.' London: Academic Press. 237-313.
2. Baddeley, A. D. (1996). Your memory. A user's guide. London: Prion.
3. Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.) (1996). Memory. London: Academic Press.
4. Bradley, R., & Swartz, N. (1979). Possible worlds. An introduction to logic and its philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
5. Brandtstadter, J. (1987). On certainty and universality in human development: developmental psychology between apriorism and empiricism. In M. Chapman & R. A. Dixon (Eds.), Meaning and the growth of understanding: Wittgenstein's significance for developmental psychology (pp. 69-84). Berlin: Springer.
6. Cooper, L. A. & Lang, J. M. (1996). Imagery and visual-spatial representations. In Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.) Memory. London: Academic Press. Pp. 129-164.
7. Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. (1996). Organization and recall in verbal tasks and in subject-performed tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 257-273.
8. Eysenck, M. W. & Keane, M. T. (1995). Cognitive Psychology. Hove, UK.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Fodor, J. A. (1998). Concepts. Where cognitive science went wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10. Furnham, A. The psychology of common sense. In Siegfried, J. (Ed.). (1994). The status of common sense in psychology, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11. Gergen, K. J. (1986). Correspondence versus autonomy in the language of understanding human action. In D. W. Fiske & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Metatheory in social science: pluralisms and subjectivities (pp. 136-162). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Gergen, K. J. (1987). The language of psychological understanding. In H. J. Stam, T. B. Rogers, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), The analysis of psychological theory (pp.115-129). New York: Hemisphere.
13. Goddard, C. & Wierzbicka, A. (1994). Introducing lexical primitives. In C. Goddard & A. Wierzbicka (Eds.), Semantic and lexical universals (pp. 31-54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
14. Godden, D. & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two environments: on land and under water. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 325-331.
15. Godden, D. & Baddeley, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory? British Journal of Psychology, 71, 99-104.
16. Helstrup, T. (1996). Recall of spatial movement patterns as a function of context and encoding. Psychologische Beitrage, 38, 393-403.
17. Hitch, G. J., Brandimonte, M. A. & Walker, P. (1995). Two types of representation in visual memory: Evidence from the effects of stimulus contrast on image combination. Memory and Cognition, 23, 147-154.
18. Hunt, R. R. & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421-445.
19. Jenkins, J. J. (1980). Can we have a fruitful cognitive psychology? Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 211-238.
20. Kelley, C. M. & Lindsay, D. S. (1996). Conscious and unconscious forms of memory. In Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.) Memory. London: Academic Press. 31-63.
21. Kellogg, R. T. (1995). Cognitive Psychology. London: Sage.
22. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Mantyla, T. (1986). Optimizing cue effectiveness. Recall of 500 and 600 incidentally learned words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 12, 66-71.
24. Martin, E. (1965). Transfer of verbal paired associates. Psychological Review, 72, 327-343.
25. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L. & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254-278.
26. Neugebauer, O. (1957). The exact sciences in antiquity. New York: Dover Publications.
27. Osgood, C. E. (1949). The similarity paradox in human learning: a resolution. Psychological Review, 56, 132-143.
28. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Pearson, D. G., Logie, R. H. & Green, C. (1996). Mental manipulation, visual working memory, and executive processes. Psychologische Beitrage, 38, 324-342.
30. Pickering, M. & Chater, N. (1995). Why cognitive science is not formalized folk psychology. Minds and Machines, 5, 309-337.
31. Quinn, J. G. & McConnell, J. (1996). Indications of the functional distinction between the components of visual working memory. Psychologische Beitrage, 38, 355-367.
32. Roediger, H. L. & Guynn, M. E. (1996). Retrieval processes. In Bjork, E. L. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.) Memory. London: Academic Press. Pp. 197-236.
33. Ruiz-Vargas, J. M., Cuevas, I. & Marschark, M. (1996). The effects of concreteness on memory: dual codes or dual processing? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 45-72.
34. Salway, A. F. S. & Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuospatial working memory, movement control and executive demands. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 253-269.
35. Shotter, J. (1994). Is there a logic in common sense? The scope and limits of Jan Smedslund's "geometric" psychologic. In Siegfried, J. (Ed.). (1994). The status of common sense in psychology, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36. Siegfried, J. (Ed.). (1994). The status of common sense in psychology, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37. Smedslund, G. (1997). Some psychological theories are not empirical. A conceptual analysis of the 'stages of change' model. Theory and Psychology, 7, 529-544.
38. Smedslund, J. (1964). Concrete reasoning. A study of intellectual development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29, No. 2.
39. Smedslund, J. (1972). Becoming a psychologist, theoretical foundations for a humanistic psychology. Oslo: Oslo University Press.
40. Smedslund, J. (1978). Bandura's theory of self-efficacy: A set of common sense theorems. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 19, 1-14.
41. Smedslund, J. (1979). Between the analytic and the arbitrary: A case study of psychological research. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, 1-12.
42. Smedslund, J. (1981). The logic of psychological treatment. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 65-77.
43. Smedslund, J. (1982). Revising explications of common sense through dialogue: Thirty-six psychological theorems. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 299-305.
44. Smedslund, J. (1984). What is necessarily true in psychology? In J. R. Royce & L. P. Mos (Eds. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 2, 241-272.
45. Smedslund, J. (1987a). The epistemic status of interitem correlations in Eysenck's Personality Questionnaire: The a priori versus the empirical in psychological data. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 28, 42-55.
46. Smedslund, J. (1987b). Ebbinghaus the illusionist: How psychology came to look like an experimental science. In Passauer Schriften zur Psychologiegeschichte, 5, Ebbinghaus-Studien 2 (pp. 225-239). Passau: Passavia Universitaetsverlag.
47. Smedslund, J. (1988). Psycho-Logic Heidelberg & New York: Springer-Verlag.
48. Smedslund, J. (1990). A critique of Tversky and Kahneman's distinction between fallacy and misunderstanding. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31, 110-120.
49. Smedslund, J. (1991a). The pseudoempirical in psychology and the case for psychologic. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 325-338.
50. Smedslund, J. (1991b). Psychologic: A technical language for psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 376-382.
51. Smedslund, J. (1992). Are Frijda's "Laws of emotion" empirical? Cognition and Emotion, 6, 435-456.
52. Smedslund, J. (1994a). Nonempirical and empirical components in the hypotheses of five social psychological experiments. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 35, 1-15.
53. Smedslund, J. (1994b). What kind of propositions are set forth in developmental research? Five case studies. Human Development, 37, 259-276.
54. Smedslund, J. (1995). Auxiliary versus theoretical hypotheses and ordinary versus scientific language. Human Development, 38, 174-178.
55. Smedslund, J. (1997a). The structure of psychological common sense. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Smedslund, J. (1997b). The forgotten variable of understanding. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition., 16, 217-221.
57. Smedslund, J. (1998). Social representations and psychologic. Culture & Psychology, 4, 349-368.
58. Squire, L. R. (1994). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. In Schachter, D. L. & Tulving, E. (Eds.) Memory systems 1994. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1994.
59. Tulving, E. (1981). Similarity relations in recognition. Journal of verbal learning and verbal beahvior, 20, 479-496.
60. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
61. Van der Waerden, B. L. (1988). Science awakening. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
62. Wallach, L. & Wallach, M.A. (1994). Gergen versus the mainstream: Are hypotheses in social psychology subject to empirical test? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 233-242.
63. Wallach, M.A. & Wallach, L. (1998a). When experiments serve little purpose: Misguided research in mainstream psychology. Theory and Psychology, 8, 183-194.
64. Wallach, M.A. & Wallach, L. (1998b). Of surrogacy, circularity, causality and near-tautologies. Theory and Psychology, 8, 213-217.
65. Zimmer, H.D. (1996). Memory for spatial location and enactment. Psychologische Beitrage, 38, 404-417.