The holding function of theory

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 131-153

  Almond, Richard ^a,b,c  

^a San Francisco Center for Psychoanalysis   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSCIOUSNESS; COUNTER TRANSFERENCE; DEFENSE MECHANISM; EMOTION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NARCISSISM; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; REVIEW; SELF ESTEEM; THEORETICAL MODEL; TRANSFERENCE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; MALE;

ADULT; COUNTERTRANSFERENCE (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY;

EID: 0042235121     PISSN: 00030651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00030651030510010101     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. ALMOND, R. (1989). Psychological change in Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 44:304-324.
2. _ (1995). The analytic role: A mediating influence in the interplay of transference and countertransference. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 43:469-494.
3. _ (1999). The patient's part in analytic process: The influence of the analyst's expectations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 47:520-541.
4. ARON, L. (1996). A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
5. BACHANT, J., & RICHARDS, A. (1993). Review essay: Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration, by Steven Mitchell. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 3:431-460.
6. BADER, M.J. (1994). The tendency to neglect therapeutic aims in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 63:246-270.
7. COEN, S. (2000a). Why we need to write openly about our clinical cases. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48:449-470.
8. _ (2000b). The wish to regress in patient and analyst. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 48:785-810.
9. _ (2002). Affect Intolerance in Patient and Analyst. Northvale, NJ:Aronson.
10. EISOLD, K. (1994). The intolerance of diversity in psychoanalytic institutes. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 75:785-800.
11. _ (1998). The New York Psychoanalytic Society's splitting and construction of authority. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 79:871-886.
12. FEINSILVER, D. (1999). Counteridentification, comprehensive countertransference, and therapeutic action: Toward resolving the intrapsychic-interactional dichotomy. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 68:264-303.
13. FONAGY, P. (2003). Some complexities in the relationship of psychoanalytic theory to technique. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 72:13-42.
14. FRANK, J.D., & FRANK, J.B. (1991). Persuasion and Healing, 3rd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
15. FRIEDMAN, L. (1988). The Anatomy of Psychotherapy. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
16. FREUD, S. (1913). On beginning the treatment. Standard Edition 12:121-143.
17. GABBARD, G., & LESTER, E. (1995). Boundaries and Boundary Violations in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
18. GEDO, J., & GOLDBERG, A. (1973). Models of the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. GRUSKY, Z. (1999). Conviction and conversion: The role of shared fantasies about psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 68:401-430.
20. _ (2001). Conviction and interpretation: Hiding and seeking with words. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 71:81-115.
21. HAMILTON, V. (1996). The Analyst's Preconscious. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
22. HAYNAL, A. (1988). The Technique at Issue: Controversies in Psychoanalysis from Freud and Ferenczi to Michael Balint, transl. E. Holder. London: Karnak.
23. JACOBSON, J.G. (1994). Signal affects and our psychoanalytic confusion of tongues. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 42:15-42.
24. JONES, E. (2000). Therapeutic Action: A Guide to Psychoanalytic Therapy. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
25. JOSEPH, B. (1989). Psychic change and the psychoanalytic process. In Psychic Equilibrium and Psychic Change: Selected Papers of Betty Joseph, ed. M. Feldman & E.B. Spillius. London: Tavistock/Routledge, pp. 192-202.
26. KERNBERG, O.F. (1993). Convergences and divergences in contemporary psychoanalytic technique. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 74:659-674.
27. KIRSNER, D. (2000). Unfree Associations. London: Process Press.
28. KOHUT, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self. New York: International Universities Press.
29. MODELL, A. (1975). A narcissistic defense against affects: The illusion of self-sufficiency. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 56:275-285.
30. PINE, F. (1990). Drive, Ego, Object, and Self. New York: Basic Books.
31. POLAND, W.S. (1996). Melting the Darkness: The Dyad and Principles of Clinical Practice. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
32. PULVER, S. (1993). The eclectic analyst, or the many roads to insight and change. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 41:339-358.
33. RANGELL, L. (2000). Psychoanalysis at the millennium: A unitary theory. Psychoanalytic Psychology 17:451-466.
34. RICHARDS, A.D. (1999). A.A. Brill and the politics of exclusion. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 47:9-28.
35. SCHAFER, R. (1983). The Analytic Attitude. New York: Basic Books.
36. _ (2000). Reflections on "thinking in the presence of the other." International Journal of Psychoanalysis 81:85-96.
37. SMITH, H. (2001). Hearing voices: The fate of the analyst's identifications. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 49:781-812.
38. SMITH, M.L., GLASS, G.V., & MILLER, T.I. (1980). The Benefits of Psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39. SPEZZANO, C. (1999). The triangle of clinical judgment. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 46:365-388.
40. WALLERSTEIN, R. (1988). One psychoanalysis or many? International Journal of Psychoanalys is 69:5-21.