Laparoscopic operative cholangiography: An additional advantage [1]

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 73, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 549-

  Cosman, P H ^a   Joseph, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CHOLELITHIASIS; COMMON BILE DUCT; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; LETTER; LUNG EMBOLISM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0042232306     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1445-1433.2003.02690.x     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Mirizzi P. Operative cholangiography. Surg. Gynaecol. Obst. 1937; 65: 702-10.
2. Chattelee DK, Jones WM. Value of operative cholangiography. Br. J. Clin. Prac. 1978; 32: 105-6.
3. Farha GJ, Pearson RN. Transcystic duct operative cholangiography. Personal experiences with 500 consecutive cases. Am. J. Surg. 1976; 131: 228-31.
4. Pencev D, Brady PG, Pinkas H, Boulay J. The role of ERCP in patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1994; 89: 1523-7.
5. Welbourn C, Haworth J, Leaper D, Thompson M. Prospective evaluation of ultrasonography and liver function tests for preoperative assessment of the bile duct. Br. J. Surg. 1995; 82: 1371-3.
6. Patkin M, Isabel L. Ergonomics, engineering and surgery of endosurgical dissection. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edin. 1995; 40: 120-32.
7. Joseph MC, Eyre-Brook I. A modification of dissection technique for a safer laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust. N.Z. J. Surg. 1994; 64: 626-7.
8. Schulenburg CA. Operative cholangiography: 1000 cases. Surgery 1969; 65: 723-39.