Letter: Are pareto improvements always preferred by negotiators?

Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 1-2

  Korhonen, Pekka ^a   Phillips, Jim ^b   Teich, Jeffrey ^c   Wallenius, Jyrki ^a  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

^b NORTHEASTERN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042226894     PISSN: 10579214     EISSN: 10991360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199801)7:1<1::AID-MCDA155>3.0.CO;2-E     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Teich, J., Korhonen, P., Phillips, J., and Wallenius, J., ‘Multiple issue negotiations: a study of BATNAs and corresponding indifference surfaces’, paper presented at XIth Int. Conf. on MCDM, Coimbra, August 1994.
2. Teich, J., Wallenius, H., Wallenius, J., and Zionts, S., ‘Identifying Pareto-optimal settlements for two-party resource allocation negotiations’, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 93, 536-579(1996).