The Shadow of the Group in the Dawn of the 21st Century: The Journey from Varniai

Group

Volumn 24, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 115-122

  Nitsun, Morris ^a,b  

^a Redbridge Health Care Trust   (United Kingdom)

^b NORTH EAST LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Future threats; Group ambivalence; Social violence; The Anti Group

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042226777     PISSN: 03624021     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007554313391     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Armstrong, D. (1995). The psychoanalytic approach to institutional life: Why so little impact. Group Analysis, 28, 33-45.
2. Dies, R. R. (1992). Models of group psychotherapy: Sifting through confusion. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 42, 1-17.
3. Craib, I. (1997). Trying to make sense of the Anti-Group. Group Analysis, 30, 107-118.
4. Jacobson, D. (1998). Heshel's kingdom. London: Penguin.
5. Mishan, J., & Bateman, A. (1994). Group-analytic therapy of borderline patients in a day hospital setting. Group Analysis, 27, 483-495.
6. Nitsun, M. (1991). The Anti-Group: Destructive forces in the group and their therapeutic potential. Group Analysis, 24(1), 7-20.
7. Nitsun, M. (1996). The Anti-Group: Destructive forces in the group and their creative potential. London: Routledge.
8. Nitsun, M. (1998). The organisational mirror: Part II. Group Analysis, 31, 505-518.
9. Rutan, J. S., & Groves, J. E. (1989). Making society's groups more therapeutic. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 39, 3-16.
10. Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The family and individual development. London: Tavistock.
11. Winnicott, D. W. (1968). Playing and reality. London: Pelican, 1974.
12. Zelaskowski, P. (1998). The suboptimal group. Group Analysis, 31, 491-504.