메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 30, Issue 3, 1997, Pages

The Call for a Color-Blind Law

(1)  Lundin, John Marquez a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 0042224430     PISSN: 00101923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (3)

References (5)
  • 1
    • 0042109284 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 163 U.S. 537 (1896) (holding that a state may require railway companies to segregate their passenger cars by race)
    • 163 U.S. 537 (1896) (holding that a state may require railway companies to segregate their passenger cars by race).
  • 2
    • 0042109285 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Id. at 559 (Harlan, J., dissenting)
    • Id. at 559 (Harlan, J., dissenting).
  • 3
    • 0042109283 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See, e.g., Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (prohibiting segregated public schools)
    • See, e.g., Brown v. Board of Educ., 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (prohibiting segregated public schools).
  • 4
    • 0042109286 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • See Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña, 115 S. Ct. 2097 (1995) (holding that state or federal race-conscious laws are permissible but that they will be subjected to strict scrutiny by the Court and allowed only when they are narrowly tailored measures that further compelling government interests). For an example of a racial classification that survived strict scrutiny, see Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944).
  • 5
    • 0043111172 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • 163 U.S. at 550-52; see also infra Part II.B.3. The Court wrote in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, that Plessy had been overruled by Brown on the "basis of facts, or an understanding of facts, changed from those which furnished the claimed justifications for the earlier constitutional resolutions." 505 U.S. 833, 836 (1992). However, Brown did not repudiate Plessy's holding that it was permissible for a state to classify its citizens based on race. In Brown, the Court found that even if segregated educational facilities were equal, segregation in educational institutions was impermissible because of the psychological effect of the segregation on African-American children. 347 U.S. at 493-95. This is not a repudiation of racial classification, it is a finding that a particular use of racial classification (segregation of educational facilities) is impermissible because of its adverse effect.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.