Assessment of respondent acceptability of preference measures: Discriminatory power of graphic positioning scale versus traditional scaling measures

Value in Health

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 483-493

  Franic, Duska M ^a   Pathak, Dev S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CHRONIC DISEASE; FEMALE; GRAPHIC POSITIONING SCALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; NAUSEA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RATING SCALE; TRADITIONAL SCALE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; VOMITING;

EID: 0042208365     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.64221.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys. (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 2000.
2. Fowler F. Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation. (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995.
3. Goldstein WM, Hogarth RM. Judgment and decision research: some historical context. In: Research in Judgment and Decision Making. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
4. Narayana CL. Graphic positioning scale: an economical instrument for surveys. J Mark Res 1977;14:118-22.
5. Torrance GW. Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Soc Econ Plan Sci 1976;1:129-36.
6. Torrance GW, Feeney D. Utilities and quality adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1989;5:559-75.
7. Furlong W, Feeney D, Torrance GW, et al. Guide to Design and Development of Health State Utility Instrumentation. Center for Health Economics Policy Analysis Working Paper Series. Paper No. 90-9. Hamilton (Ontario): McMaster University, 1990.
8. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986;5:1-30.
9. Torrance GW. Preferences for health states: a review of measurement methods. In: Clinical and Economic Evaluation of Perinatal and Developmental Medicine. No. 20. Evansville: Mead Johnson and Johnson, 1982.
10. Sackett DL, Torrance GW. The utility of different health states as perceived by the general public. J Chron Dis 1978;31:697-704.
11. Adams PF, Marano MA. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 1994. Vital Health Stat 1995;10:4.
12. Bala MV, Zarkin GA. Are QALYs an appropriate measure for valuing morbidity in acute diseases? Health Econ 2000;9:177-80.
13. Franic DM. Relating Quality Adjusted Life Years to Contingent Valuation: Acute Versus Chronic Conditions [dissertation]. Columbus: The Ohio State University, 2000.
14. Franic DM, Pathak DS, Gafni A. Are health states "timeless": a case study of an acute condition - post chemotherapy nausea and vomiting. J Eval Clin Prac 2003;9:69-82.
15. Franic DM, Pathak DS. Effect of including (versus excluding) fates worse than death in utility assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003;19:346-60.
16. Torrance GW, Feeny D, Furlong W. Visual analogue scales: do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Med Decis Making 2001;21:329-34.
17. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC. Identifying and valuing outcomes. In: Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
18. Spector PE. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, #7. Research Designs. In: Sullivan JL, Niemi RG, eds., Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1987.
19. Flowers CR, Garber AM, Bergen MR, et al. Willingness to pay utility assessment, feasibility of use in normative patient decision support systems. In: Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Fall Symposium 1997. Philadelphia: Hanley Belfus, 1997. p. 223-7.
20. Zielger JK, Hornberger JC, Pao V, et al. Assessing the Effects of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators on Quality of Life Using an Automated Computer Interview. Technical report, San Diego, University of California, August 2003.
21. Lenert LA, Cher DJ, Goldstein MK, et al. The effect of search procedures on utility assessment. Med Decis Making 1998;18:76-83.
22. Kwong WJ, Parasuraman TV. Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral ondansetron and prochlorperazine for preventing nausea and vomiting after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Pharm Pract Manag Q 1999;19:28-41.
23. Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB, et al. On the receiving end - patient perception of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1983;19:203-8.
24. Levine AM, Richardson JL, Marks G, et al. Compliance with oral drug therapy in patients with hematologic malignancy. J Clin Oncol 1987;5:1469-76.
25. Lindley CM, Hirsch JD, O'Neill CV, et al. Quality of life consequences of chemotherapy induced emesis. Qual Life Res 1992;1:331-40.
26. Richardson JL, Marks G, Levine A. The influence of symptoms and side effects of treatment on compliance with therapy. J Clin Oncol 1988;6:1746-52.
27. Osoba D, Zee B, Warr D, et al. Effect of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting on health-related quality of life. Support Care Cancer 1997;5:307-13.
28. Grunberg SM, Boutin N, Ireland A, et al. Impact of nausea and vomiting on quality of life as a visual analogue scale-derived utility score. Support Care Cancer 1996;6:435-9.
29. Kuchler T. Quality of life and breast cancer - the learning curve never ends. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:277-8.
30. Clarke AE, Goldstein MK, Garber AM, et al. The effect of assessment method and respondent population on utilities elicited for Gaucher disease. Qual Life Res 1997;6:169-84.
31. Lenert L, Morss S, Goldstein M, et al. Measurement of the validity of utility elicitations. Med Care 1997;35:915-20.
32. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. (3rd ed.). New York: MacMillan, 1992.
33. Stevens JP. Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. (4th ed.). Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.
34. Keppel G. Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall, 1991.