Response of streamflow to multiple earthquakes

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2003, Pages

  Manga, Michael ^a,b   Brodsky, Emily E ^c   Boone, Michael ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Consolidation; Earthquakes; Liquefaction; Pore pressure; Streamflow

Indexed keywords

HYDRAULICS; PORE PRESSURE; STREAM FLOW; CONSOLIDATION; EARTHQUAKES; LIQUEFACTION; VELOCITY CONTROL;

DYNAMIC STRAIN; A-PARTICLES; HYDRAULIC DIFFUSIVITY; LARGE EARTHQUAKES; PRESSURE INCREASE; STREAMFLOW RESPONSE;

EARTHQUAKES; GEOPHYSICS;

EARTHQUAKE; HYDROLOGICAL CHANGE; STRAIN; STREAMFLOW;

EID: 0042200446     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2002GL016618     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bouchon, M., Discrete wave number representation of elastic wave field in three-space dimension, J. Geophys. Res., 84, 3609-3614, 1979.
2. Dobry, R., R. S. Ladd, F. Y. Yokel, R. M. Chung, and D. Powell, Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method, NBS Building Sci. Ser. U. S., 138, 1982.
3. Domenico, P. A., and F. W. Schwartz, Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology, 2nd ed., John Wiley, New York, 1998.
4. King, C. Y., D. Basler, T. S. Presser, W. C. Evans, L. D. White, and A. Minissale, In search of earthquake-related hydrologic and chemical changes along Hayward fault, Appl. Geochem., 9, 83-91, 1994.
5. Lee, M., T.-K. Liu, K.-F. Ma, and Y.-M. Chang, Coseismic hydrological changes associated with dislocation of the September 21, 1999 Chichi earthquake, Taiwan, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(17), 1824, doi:10.1029/ 2002GL015116, 2002.
6. Leonardi, V., F. Arthaud, A. Tovmassian, and A. Karakhanian, Tectonic and seismic conditions for changes in spring discharge along the Garni right lateral strike slip fault (Armenian Upland), Geodin. Acta, 11, 85-103, 1990.
7. Manga, M., Origin of postseismic streamflow changes inferred from baseflow recession and magnitude-distance relations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2133-2136, 2001.
8. Montgomery, D. R., H. M. Greenberg, and D. T. Smith, Streamflow response to the Nisqually earthquakes, Earth Planet Sci. Lett., in press, 2003.
9. Muir-Wood, R., and G. C. P. King, Hydrological signatures of earthquake strain, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 22,035-22,068, 1993.
10. Roeloffs, E. A., Persistent water level changes in a well near Parkfield, CA, due to local and distant earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 869-889, 1998.
11. Rojstaczer, S., and S. Wolf, Permeability changes associated with large earthquakes: An example from Loma Prieta, California, Geology, 20, 211-214, 1992.
12. Sato, T., R. Sakai, K. Furuya, and T. Kodama, Coseismic spring flow changes associated with the 1995 Kobe earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1219-1222, 2000.
13. Terzaghi, K., R. B. Peck, and G. Mesri, Soil Mechanics in engineering practice, 3rd ed., John Wiley, New York, 1996.
14. Toda, S., et al., Stress transferred by the 1995 M - w = 6.9 Kobe, Japan, shock: Effect on aftershocks and future earthquake probabilities, Geophys. Res. Lett., 103, 24,543-24,565, 1998.
15. Vucetic, M., Cyclic threshold shear strains in soils, J. Geotech. Eng., 120, 2208-2228, 1994.
16. Zhu, L., and L. A. Rivera, A note on the dynamic and static displacements from a point source in multilayered media, Geophys. J. Int., 148, 69-627, 2002.