Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia is better than spinal or epidural alone for Caesarean delivery [2]

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 299-300

  Ranasinghe, J S ^a   Steadman, J ^a   Toyama, T ^a   Lai, M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADRENALIN; BUPIVACAINE; EPHEDRINE; FENTANYL; LIDOCAINE; MORPHINE;

ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; EPIDURAL CATHETER; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; HYSTERECTOMY; LETTER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL HYPERTENSION; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0042200424     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg596     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Hawkins JL, Koonin LM, Palmer SK, et al. Anesthesia-related deaths during obstetric delivery in the United States. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 277-84
2. Rawal N. Single segment combined subarachnoid and epidural block for Caesarean section. Can Anaesth Soc J 1986; 33: 254-5
3. Rawal N, Schollin J, Wesstrom G. Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for Caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1988; 32: 61-6
4. Rawal N, Van Zundert A, Holmstrom B, et al. Combined spinal-epidural technique. Reg Anesth 1997; 22: 406-23
5. Carrie LES. Epidural versus combined spinal epidural block for Caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1988; 32: 595-6
6. Coates MB. Combined subarachnoid and epidural techniques. Anaesthesia 1982; 37: 89-90