Impact of artificial root exudates on the bacterial community structure in bulk soil and maize rhizosphere

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1183-1192

  Baudoin, Ezékiel ^a   Benizri, Emile ^a   Guckert, Armand ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

Author keywords

Bacterial community structure; Biolog ; Exudates; Maize; Rhizosphere; RISA

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; BACTERIOLOGY; CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; METABOLITES; OXIDATION; PLANTS (BOTANY);

BACTERIAL DENSITIES;

BIOCHEMISTRY;

BACTERIUM; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; EXUDATION; RHIZOSPHERE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ZEA MAYS;

EID: 0042199137     PISSN: 00380717     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00179-2     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Acinas, S.G., Antøn, J., Rodríguez-Valera, F., 1999. Diversity of free-living and attached bacteria in off-shore Western Mediterranean waters as depicted by 16S rDNA analysis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 514-522.
2. Baudoin, E., Benizri, E., Guckert, A., 2001. Metabolic structure of bacterial communities from distinct maize rhizosphere compartments. European Journal of Soil Biology 37, 85-93.
3. Baudoin, E., Benizri, E., Guckert, A., 2002. Impact of growth stage on the bacterial community structure along maize roots, as determined by metabolic and genetic fingerprinting. Applied Soil Ecology 19, 135-145.
4. Bossio, D.A., Scow, K.M., 1995. Impact of carbon and flooding on the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in soils. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, San Diego 61, 4043-4050.
5. Bowen, G.D., Rovira, A.D., 1999. The rhizosphere and its management to improve plant growth. In: Sparks, D.L., (Ed.), Advances in Agronomy, vol. 66. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-102.
6. 14C(U) glucose in soil is affected by the amount and timing of glucose additions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26, 511-517.
7. 4 to soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 22, 707-713.
8. 2, rhizosphere processes, and soil organic matter decomposition. Plant and Soil 202, 167-174.
9. Cheng, W., Zhang, Q., Coleman, D.C., Carroll, C.R., Hoffman, C.A., 1996. Is available carbon limiting microbial respiration in the rhizosphere? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28, 1283-1288.
10. Curl, E.A., Truelove, B. (Eds.), 1986. The rhizophere, Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 288.
11. Darrah, P.R., 1991. Models of the rhizosphere. I. Microbial population dynamics around a root releasing soluble and insoluble carbon. Plant and Soil 133, 187-199.
12. Fisher, M.M., Klug, J.L., Lauster, G., Newton, M., Triplett, E.W., 2000. Effects of resources and trophic interactions on freshwater bacterioplankton diversity. Microbial Ecology 40, 125-138.
13. Garland, J.L., 1996. Analytical approaches to the characterization of samples of microbial communities using patterns of potential C source utilization. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28, 213-221.
14. Garland, J.L., Cook, K.L., Loader, C.A., Hungate, B.A., 1997. The influence of microbial community structure and function on community-level physiological profiles. In: Insam, H., Rangger, A. (Eds.), Microbial Communities: Functional Versus Structural Approaches, Springer, New York, pp. 171-183.
15. Grayston, S.J., Campbell, C.D., 1996. Functional biodiversity of microbial communities in the rhizospheres of hybrid larch (Larix eurolepis) and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis). Tree Physiology 16, 1031-1038.
16. Grayston, S.J., Wang, S., Campbell, C.D., Edwards, A.C., 1998a. Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30, 369-378.
17. 2 on the metabolic diversity of microbial communities in N-limited grass swards. Plant and Soil 203, 289-300.
18. Griffiths, B.S., Ritz, K., Ebblwhite, N., Dobson, G., 1999. Soil microbial community structure: effects of substrate loading rates. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31, 145-153.
19. Griffiths, B.S., Bonkowski, M., Roy, J., Ritz, K., 2001. Functional stability, substrate utilisation and biological indicators of soils following environmental impacts. Applied Soil Ecology 16, 49-61.
20. Haack, S.K., Garchow, H., Klug, M., Forney, J.J., 1995. Analysis of factors affecting the accuracy, reproducibility, and interpretation of microbial community carbon source utilization patterns. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 1458-1468.
21. Hale, M.G., Moore, L.D., Griffin, G.J., 1978. Chapter 5: root exudates and exudation. In: Dommergues, Y.R., Krupa, S.V. (Eds.), Interactions Between Non-pathogenic Soil Microorganisms and Plants, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 163-203.
22. Hannen, E.J., Mooij, W., van Agterveld, M.P., Gons, H.J., Laanbroek, H.J., 1999. Detritus-dependent development of the microbial community in an experimental system: qualitative analysis by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 2478-2484.
23. Hodge, A., Paterson, E., Thornton, B., Millard, P., Killham, K., 1997. Effects of photon flux density on carbon partitioning and rhizosphere carbon flow of Lolium perenne. Journal of Experimental Botany 48, 1797-1805.
24. Iijima, M., Griffiths, B., Bengough, A.G., 2000. Sloughing of cap cells and carbon exudation from maize seedling roots in compacted sand. New Phytologist 145, 477-482.
25. Jones, D.L., Darrah, P.R., 1992. Re-sorption of organic compounds by roots of Zea mays L. and its consequences in the rhizosphere; I. Re-sorption of 14C labelled glucose, mannose and citric acid. Plant and Soil 143, 259-266.
26. Jones, D.L., Darrah, P.R., 1995. Influx and efflux of organic acids across the soil root interface of Zea mays L. and its implications in the rhizosphere C flow. Plant and Soil 173, 103-109.
27. Jones, D.L., Darrah, P.R., 1996. Re-sorption of organic compounds by roots of Zea mays L. and its consequences in the rhizosphere; III. Characteristics of sugar influx and efflux. Plant and Soil 178, 153-160.
28. Konopka, A., Oliver, L., Turco, R.F., 1998. The use of carbon substrate utilization patterns in environmental and ecological microbiology. Microbial Ecology 35, 103-115.
29. Kozdrój, J., van Elsas, J.D., 2000. Response of the bacterial community to root exudates in soil polluted with heavy metals assessed by molecular and cultural approaches. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 32, 1405-1417.
30. Kraffczyk, I., Trolldenier, G., Beringer, H., 1984. Soluble root exudates of maize: influence of potassium supply and rhizosphere microorganisms. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 16, 315-322.
31. Lugtenberg, B.J.J., Dekkers, L.C., 1999. What makes Pseudomonas bacteria rhizosphere competent? Environmental Microbiology 1, 9-13.
32. Lynch, J.M., Whipps, J.M., 1990. Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant and Soil 129, 1-10.
33. Newman, E.I., 1985. The rhizosphere: carbon sources and microbial populations. In: Fitter, A.D., (Ed.), Ecological Interactions in Soil, Blackwell, London, pp. 107-122.
34. Normand, P., Ponsonnet, C., Nesme, X., Neyra, M., Simonet, P., 1996. ITS analysis of prokaryotes. Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual 3.4.5, 1-12.
35. 2 concentration on C-partitioning and rhizosphere C-flow for three plant species. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 28, 195-201.
36. Pierson, L.S. III, Wood, D.W., Pierson, E.A., Chancey, S.T., 1998a. N-Acyl-homoserine lactone mediated gene regulation in biological control by fluorescent pseudomonads: current knowledge and future work. European Journal of Plant Pathology 104, 1-9.
37. Pierson, L.S. III, Wood, D.W., Pierson, E.A., 1998b. Homoserine lactone-mediated gene regulation in plant-associated bacteria. Annual Review of Phytopathology 36, 207-225.
38. Rillig, M.C., Scow, K.M., Klironomos, J.N., Allen, M.F., 1997. Microbial carbon-substrate utilization in the rhizosphere of Gutierrezia sarothrae grown in elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 29, 1387-1394.
39. Rovira, A.D., 1959. Root excretions in relation to the rhizosphere effect; IV. Influence of plant species, age of plant, light, temperature, and calcium nutrition on exudation. Plant and Soil 11, 53-64.
40. Schutter, M., Dick, R., 2001. Shifts in substrate utilization potential and structure of soil microbial communities in response to carbon substrates. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33, 1481-1491.
41. Scott, J.S., Knudsen, G.R., 1999. Soil amendments effects of rape (Brassica napus) residues on pea rhizosphere bacteria. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 31, 1435-1441.
42. Trofymow, J.A., Coleman, D.C., Cambardella, C., 1987. Rates of rhizodeposition and ammonium depletion in the rhizosphere of axenic oat roots. Plant and Soil 97, 333-344.
43. Vershuere, L., Fievez, V., van Vooren, L., Verstraete, W., 1997. The contribution of individual populations to the Biolog pattern of model microbial communities. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 24, 353-362.
44. Yang, C.H., Crowley, D.E., 2000. Rhizosphere microbial community structure in relation to root location and plant iron nutritional status. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 66, 345-351.
45. Zak, J.C., Willig, M.R., Moorhead, D.L., Wildman, H.G., 1994. Functional diversity of microbial communities: a quantitative approach. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26, 1101-1108.