Need for safety goggles for endoscopy

Endoscopy

Volumn 35, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 803-

  Benter, T ^a   Kluhs L ^a   Teichgraber U K M ^b   Riechert, F ^a   Ludwig, W D ^a   Dorken B ^a  

^a Section of Pathology   (Germany)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; CASE REPORT; CHRONIC DISEASE; COLONOSCOPY; CONJUNCTIVITIS; CROHN DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIARRHEA; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; EYE INFECTION; HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; OCULAR PRURITUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

COLONOSCOPY; CONJUNCTIVITIS, BACTERIAL; EYE PROTECTIVE DEVICES; HUMANS;

EID: 0042196210     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-41574     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Haringsma J, Tytgat GN. The value of fluorescence techniques in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Better than the endoscopist's eye? 1: The European experience. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 416-418
2. Kaiser HJ, Flammer J, Miller G. Chronic light damage to the macula of an endoscopist. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 401-402
3. Cohen RV, Aldred MA, Paes WS et al. How safe is ERCP to the endoscopist? Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 615-617
4. Taylor JD. AIDS and hepatitis B and C contamination risk at transurethral resection: A study using sodium fluorescein as a marker. Med J Aust 1990; 153: 257-260
5. Selmaier M, Stillkrieg W, Muller RG et al. Radiation burden in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [in German]. Z Gastroenterol 1994; 32: 671-674.