Arguments for adjuncts

Cognition

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 67-103

  Koenig, Jean Pierre ^a   Mauner, Gail ^a,b   Bienvenue, Breton ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjuncts; Argument structure; Arguments; Instruments; Lexical semantics; Lexicon; Locations; Sentence processing; Verb

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); ONLINE SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

LEXICAL ENCODING;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; CODING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMANTICS; SPEECH; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0042159901     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00082-9     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Bienvenue, B (1997). Comprehension of unexpressed locations. Unpublished Honor's thesis, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
2. Boland J. The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension. Language and Cognitive Processes. 12:1997;423-484.
3. Boland J., Boehm-Jernigan H. Lexical constraints and prepositional phrase attachment. Journal of Memory and Language. 39:1998;684-719.
4. Boland J., Tanenhaus M.K. Evidence for the immediate use of verb control information in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language. 29:1990;413-432.
5. Boland J.E., Tanenhaus M.K., Garnsey S., Carlson G. Verb argument structure in parsing and interpretation: evidence from WH-questions. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1989;774-806.
6. Brecht M.L., Woodward J.A., Bonett D.G. GANOVA 4, textbook version. 1982-1987;Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA.
7. Bresnan J. Control and complementation. Bresnan J. The mental representation of grammatical relations. 1982;292-390 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Briscoe T., Copestake A., de Paiva A. Inheritance, defaults, and the lexicon. 1993;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Carlson G., Tanenhaus M. Thematic roles and language comprehension. Syntax and semantics. Syntax and semantics. 21:1988;Academic Press, New York.
10. Chomsky N. Lectures on government and binding. 1981;Foris, Dordrecht.
11. Chomsky N. Knowledge of language. 1986;Praeger, New York.
12. Clifton C. Thematic roles in sentence processing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 47:1993;222-246.
13. Clifton C. Jr., Frazier L. Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. Carlson G.N., Tanenhaus M.K. Linguistic structure in language processing. 1989;273-317 Kluwer, Dordrecht.
14. Collins A., Quillian M., Ross M. Facilitating retrieval from semantic memory: the effect of repeating part of an inference. Acta Psychologica. 33:1970;304-314.
15. Coltheart M. The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 33:1981;497-505.
16. Crain S., Fodor J. How can grammars help parsers? Karttunen L., Dowty D., Zwicky A. Natural language processing: psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives. 1985;Cambridge University Press, New York.
17. Davis A., Koenig J.-P. Linking as constraints on word classes in a hierarchical lexicon. Language. 76:2000;56-91.
18. Dowty D. Grammatical relations and Montague grammar. Jacobson P., Pullum G. The nature of syntactic representations. 1982;79-130 Reidel, Dordrecht.
19. Dowty D. On the semantic content of the notion of 'thematic role'. Chierchia G., Partee B., Turner R. Properties, types, and meaning. 2:1989;69-129 Kluwer, Dordrecht.
20. Dowty D. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language. 67:1991;547-619.
21. Ferreira F., Clifton C. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language. 25:1986;348-368.
22. Foley W., Van Valin R. Functional syntax and universal grammar. 1984;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Givòn T. Syntax: a functional-typological introduction. 1984;John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
24. Goldberg A. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. 1995;Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
25. Huang, J (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
26. Jackendoff R. Semantic structures. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
27. Just M., Carpenter P. The psychology of reading and language comprehension. 1987;Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
28. Koenig, J.-P (1994). Lexical underspecification and the syntax/semantics interface. PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
29. Koenig J.-P. Lexical relations. 1999;CSLI, Stanford, CA.
30. Koenig J.-P., Mauner G. A-definites and the semantics of implicit arguments. Journal of Semantics. 16:(3):1999;207-236.
31. Kucera H., Francis W.N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. 1967;Brown University Press, Providence, RI.
32. Langacker R. Foundations of cognitive grammar. 1:1987;Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
33. Levin B. English verb classes and alternations. 1993;Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
34. Levin B., Rappaport-Hovav M. Unaccusativity at the syntax-lexical semantics interface. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Liversedge S., Pickering M., Branigan H., Van Gompel R. Processing arguments and adjuncts in isolation and in context: the case of by-phrase ambiguities in passives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 24:1998;461-475.
36. Mauner G., Koenig J.-P. Linguistic vs. conceptual sources of implicit agents in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language. 43:2000;110-134.
37. Mauner G., Tanenhaus M., Carlson G. Implicit arguments in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language. 34:1995;357-382.
38. McKoon G., Albritton D., Ratcliff R. Sentential context effects on lexical decisions with a cross-modal instead of an all-visual procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 22:1996;1494-1497.
39. McRae K., Ferretti T.Y., Amyote L. Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Language and Cognitive Processes (Special Issue: Lexical Representations in Sentence Processing). 12:1996;137-176.
40. Miller P. Complèments et circonstants: une distinction syntaxique ou sèmantique? Souesme J.-C. Actes du 37 ème Congrès de la SAES. 1997;91-103 Presses Universitaires de Nice, Nice.
41. Pinker S. Learnability and cognition: the acquisition of argument structure. 1989;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
42. Pollard C., Sag I. Information-based syntax and semantics. 1:1987;CSLI, Stanford, CA.
43. Pollard C., Sag I. Head-driven phrase-structure grammar. 1994;Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL.
44. Quillian M.R. Semantic memory. Minsky M. Semantic information processing. 1968;216-270 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
45. Resnick P. Selectional constraints: an information-theoretic model and its computational realization. Brent M. Computational approaches to language acquisition. 1997;127-159 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
46. Resnik P. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: an information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 11:1999;95-130.
47. Rumelhart D., Todd P. Learning and connectionist representations. Meyer D., Kornblum S. Attention and performance. Attention and performance. XIV:1993;3-30 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
48. Schütze C. PP attachment and argumenthood. Papers on language processing and acquisition. 26:1995;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
49. Schütze C., Gibson E. Argumenthood and English prepositional phrase attachment. Journal of Memory and Language. 40:1999;409-431.
50. Sparck-Jones K. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation. 28:1972;11-21.
51. Speer S.R., Clifton C. Jr. Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension. Memory and Cognition. 26:1998;965-978.
52. Stowe L.A. Parsing WH-constructions: evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes. 1:1986;227-245.
53. Stowe L., Tanenhaus M.K., Carlson G. Filling gaps on-line: use of lexical and semantic information in sentence processing. Language and Speech. 34:1991;319-340.
54. Tanenhaus M., Boland J., Mauner G., Carlson G. More on combinatory lexical information. Altmann G., Shillcock R. Cognitive models of speech processing: the second Sperlonga meeting. 1993;297-319 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
55. Tanenhaus M., Carlson G. Lexical structure and language comprehension. Marslen-Wilson W. Lexical representation and process. 1989;529-561 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
56. Tanenhaus M.K., Garnsey S.M., Boland J. Combinatory lexical information and language comprehension. Altmann G.T. Cognitive models of speech processing. 1990;383-408 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
57. Tesnière L. Elèments de syntaxe structurale. 1959;Klincksieck, Paris.
58. Traxler M., Pickering M. Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: an eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language. 35:1996;454-475.
59. Trueswell J., Kim A. How to prune a garden path by nipping it in the bud: fast priming of verb argument structure. Journal of Memory and Language. 39:1998;102-123.
60. Trueswell J., Tanenhaus M., Garnsey S. Semantic influences on parsing: use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language. 32:1994;285-318.
61. Van Valin R. A synopsis of role and reference grammar. Van Valin R. Advances in role and reference grammar. 1993;1-164 John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
62. Van Valin R., Lapolla R. Syntax: form, meaning, and function. 1997;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
63. Vater H. On the possibility of distinguishing between complements and adjuncts. Valence, semantic case, and grammatical relations. 1978;John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
64. Wechsler S. The semantic basis of argument structure. 1995;CSLI, Stanford, CA.
65. Woodward J.A., Bonett D.G., Brecht M.L. Introduction to linear models and experimental designs. 1990;Harcourt Brace & Jovanovic/Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
66. Zurif E., Swinney D., Prather P., Solomon J., Bushells C. An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Brain and Language. 45:1993;448-464.