Turbine forced response prediction using an integrated non-linear analysis

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part K: Journal of Multi-body Dynamics

Volumn 214, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 45-60

  Sayma, A I ^a   Vahdati, M ^a   Imregun, M ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aeroelasticity; Aeroengine vibrations; Turbine forced response; Turbomachinery CFD; Unsteady time accurate viscous flows

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042150473     PISSN: 14644193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/1464419001544133     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Marshall, J. G. and Imregun, M. A review of aero-elasticity methods with emphasis on turbomachinery applications. J. Fluids and Structs, 1996, 10, 237-267.
2. Manwaring, S. R., Rabe, D. C., Lorence, C. B. and Wadia, A. R. Inlet distortion generated forced response of a low aspect ratio transonic fan. ASME paper 96-GT-376, 1996.
3. Dawes, W. N. Development of a three-dimensional Navier-Stokes solver for application to all types of turbomachinery. ASME paper 88-GT-70, 1988.
4. Arnone, A. Multigrid methods for turbomachinery Navier-Stokes calculations. In Solution Techniques for Large-Scale CFD Problems (Ed. W. Habashi), 1995, pp. 293-332 (John Wiley, Chichester).
5. Vahdati, M. and Imregun, M. Non-linear aeroelasticity analysis of a fan blade using unstructured dynamic meshes. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1996, 210(C6), 549-564.
6. Sbardella, L., Sayma, A. I. and Imregun, M. Semi-unstructured mesh generator for flow calculations in axial turbomachinery blading. In 18th International Symposium on Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity of Turbomachines (Ed. T. Fransson), 1997 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).
7. Baldwin, B. S. and Barth, T. J. A one-equation turbulence transport model for high Reynolds number wall-bounded flows. In AIAA 29th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 1991, paper AIAA 91-0610.
8. Swanson, R. C. and Turkel, E. On central-difference and upwind schemes. J. Comput. Physics, 1992, 101, 292-306.
9. Jorgenson, P. C. and Turkel, E. Central difference TVD schemes for time dependent and steady state problems. J. Comput. Physics, 1993, 107, 297-308.
10. Melson, N. D., Sanetrik, M. D. and Atkins, H. L. Time-accurate Navier-Stokes calculations with multigrid acceleration. In Proceedings of the Sixth Copper Mountain Conference on Multigrid Methods, University of Colorado, 1993.
11. Engquist, B. and Majda, A. Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves. Mathematics of Computation, 1977, 31, 629-651.
12. Higdon, R. L. Absorbing boundary conditions for difference approximations to the multi-dimensional wave equation. Mathematics of Computation, 1986, 47, 437-459.
13. Ferm, L. Non-reflecting boundary conditions for the steady Euler equations. J. Comput. Physics, 1995, 122, 307-316.
14. Giles, M. B. Non-reflecting boundary conditions for the Euler equations calculations. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1990, 28, 2050-2058.
15. Givoli, D. Non-reflecting boundary conditions. J. Comput. Physics, 1991, 94, 1-29.
16. Giles, M. B. Non-reflecting boundary conditions for the Euler equations. Technical Report TR-88-1, Computational Fluid Dynamics Lab, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1988.
17. Rai, M. M. Implicit conservative zonal boundary scheme for Euler equations calculations. Computers and Fluids, 1986, 14(3), 295-319.
18. Newmark, N. M. A method of computation for structural dynamics. ASCE J. Engng Mechanics Div., 1959, 8, 67-94.