Ex-vivo comparison of the haemostatic properties of standard transurethral resection and transurethral vaporization resection of the prostate

BJU International

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 319-322

  Reich, O ^a   Schneede, P ^a   Zaak, D ^a   Siebels, M ^a   Hofstetter, A ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

BPH; Ex vivo model; Haemostasis; Transurethral vaporization resection of the prostate; TURP

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD CLOTTING; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEMOSTASIS; HISTOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY PERFUSION; NONHUMAN; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SWINE; TRANSURETHRAL ELECTROVAPORIZATION; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION;

ANIMALS; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CATHETER ABLATION; HEMOSTASIS, SURGICAL; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; SWINE; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE;

EID: 0042134452     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04340.x     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Kaplan SA, Te AE. Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: a novel method for treating men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1995; 45: 566-72
2. Schulman CC, Zlotta AR, Rasor JS et al. Transurethral needle ablation (TUNA). safety, feasibility and tolerance of a new office procedure for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 1993; 24: 415
3. Costello AJ, Bowsher WG, Bolton DM et al. Laser ablation of the prostate in patients with benign prostatic hypertrophy. Br J Urol 1992; 69: 603-8
4. Muschter R, Hofstetter A, Hessel S et al. Interstitial laser prostatectomy. Experimental and first clinical results. J Urol 1992; 147: 346
5. Bihrle R, Forster RS, Sanghvi NT et al. High intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: early United States clinical experiences. J Urol 1994; 151: 1271-5
6. Blute ML, Tomera KM, Hellerstein DK et al. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from the United States Prostatron Cooperative Study. J Urol 1993; 150: 1591-3
7. Faul P, Farin G, Reich O, Steude U. The 'band electrode': first experience with a novel TURP procedure to improve hemostasis. Eur Urol 1996; 30: 403-8
8. Perlmutter AP, Schulsinger DA. The 'wedge' resection device for electrosurgical transurethral prostatectomy. J Endourol 1998; 12: 75-9
9. Talic RF. Transurethral electrovaporization-resection of the prostate using the 'Wing' cutting electrode: preliminary results of safety and efficacy in the treatment of men with prostatic outflow obstruction. Urology 1999; 53: 106-10
10. Talic RF, Al Rikabi AC. Transurethral vaporization-resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral prostatectomy: comparative changes in histopathologic features of the resected specimens. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 301-5
11. Gotoh M, Okamura K, Hattori R et al. A randomized comparative study of the Bandloop versus the standard loop for transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 1999; 162: 1645-7
12. Talic RF, El Tiraifi AM, El Faqih SR, Hassan SH, Attassa RA, Abdel-Halim RE. Prospective randomized study of transurethral vaporization resection of the prostate using the thick loop and the standard transurethral prostatectomy. Urology 2000; 55: 886-91
13. Kupeli S, Yilmaz E, Soygur T, Budak M. Randomized study of transurethral resection of the prostate and combined transurethral resection and vaporization of the prostate as a therapeutic alternative in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 2001; 15: 317-21
14. Holmes M, Cox J, Stewart J, King D, Bary P, Wright W. Thick vs thin loop transurethral resection of the prostate: a double-blind prospective trial of early morbidity. BJU Int 2002; 89: 197-201
15. Koehrmann KU, Back W, Bensemann J et al. The isolated perfused kidney of the pig: new model to evaluate shock wave-induced lesions. J Endourol 1994; 8: 105-10
16. Michel MS, Koehrmann KU, Weber A et al. Rotoresect. New technique for resection of the prostate: experimental phase. J Endourol 1996; 10: 473-8
17. Reich O, Corvin S, Oberneder R et al. In vitro comparison of transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TUVP), resection of the prostate (TURP), and vaporization-resection of the prostate (TUVRP). Urol Res 2002; 30: 15-20
18. Wasson JH, Reda DJ, Bruskewitz RC et al. A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 75-9
19. Neal DE. Evaluation and results of treatment for prostatism. Urol Res 1994; 22: 61-6
20. Doll HA, Black NA, McPherson K et al. Mortality, morbidity and complications following transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hypertrophy. J Urol 1992; 147: 1566-73
21. Ishikawa N, Goya N, Iguchi Y et al. Comparison of the depth of the desiccated zones with selected vaporizing-cutting electrodes: a basic study in animals. BJU Int 2000; 85: 754-8
22. Narayan P, Tewari A, Croker B et al. Factors affecting size and configuration of electrovaporization lesions in the prostate. Urology 1996; 47: 679-88
23. Larson TR, Religo WM, Collins JM, Novicki D. Detailed prostatic interstitial thermal mapping during transurethral grooved rollerball electrovaporization and loop electrosurgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1996; 48: 501-7
24. Perlmutter AP, Muschter R, Razvi HA. Electrosurgical vaporization of the prostate in the canine model. Urology 1995; 46: 518-23