In-hospital outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in Canada: 1992/93 to 2000/01

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 782-789

  Jamal, Shelina M ^a   Shrive, Fiona M ^b   Ghali, William A ^b   Knudtson, Merrill L ^b   Eisenberg, Mark J ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Angioplasty; Canada; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Mortality; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL CARE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RURAL AREA; STATISTICAL MODEL; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; HOSPITAL READMISSION; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CANADA; COMORBIDITY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT DISCHARGE; PATIENT READMISSION; PREVALENCE; RISK ADJUSTMENT;

EID: 0042131573     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Lauer MA, Karweit JA, Cascade EF, et al. Practice patterns and outcomes of PCI in the US: 1995 to 1997. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:924-9.
2. Cohen EA, Young W, Slaughter PM, et al. Trends in clinical and economic outcomes of coronary angioplasty from 1992 to 1995: A population-based analysis. Am Heart J 1999;137:1012-8.
3. Romano PS, Roos LL, Luft HS, and the Ischemic Heart Disease Patient Outcomes Research Team. A comparison of administrative versus clinical data. J Clin Epidemiol 1994;47:249-60.
4. Hannan EL, Kilburn H, Lindsey ML, et al. Clinical versus administrative data bases for CABG surgery. Does it matter? Med Care 1992;30:892-907.
5. Pine M, Norusis M, Jones B, et al. Predictions of hospital mortality rates: A comparison of data sources. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:347-54.
6. Shaw RE, Anderson HV, Brindis RG, et al. Development of a risk-adjustment mortality model using the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR) experience: 1998-2000. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:1104-12.
7. Landon B, Iezzoni LI, Ash AS, et al. Judging hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality rates: The case of CABG surgery. Inquiry 1996;33:155-66.
8. Ghali WA, Rothwell DM, Quan H, Brant R, Tu JV. A Canadian comparison of data sources for CABG outcome "report cards". Am Heart J 2000;140:402-8.
9. Canadian Classification of Diagnostic, Therapeutic, and Surgical Procedures. Cat no 82-562E. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 1986.
10. Green J, Wintfeld N, Sharkey P, Passman LJ. The importance of severity of illness in assessing hospital mortality. JAMA 1990;263:241-6.
11. Ash AS, Shwartz M. Evaluating the performance of risk-adjustment methods: Dichotomous outcomes. In: Iezzoni LI, ed. Risk-Adjustment for Measuring Health Care Outcomes, 2nd edn. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 1997:427-69.
12. International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (Clinical Modification). Washington: Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1988.
13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83.
14. Ghali W, Quan H, Brant R. Risk adjustment using administrative data: Impact of a diagnosis-type indicator. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:519-24.
15. Ghali WA, Hall RE, Rosen AK, et al. Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:273-8.
16. Peterson ED, Jollis JG, Bebchuk JD, et al. Changes in mortality after myocardial revascularization in the elderly. Ann Intern Med 1994;121:919-27.
17. Hannan EL, Arani DT, Johnson LW, et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in New York State. JAMA 1992;268:3092-7.
18. Verrilli DK, Berenson R, Katz SJ. A comparison of cardiovascular procedure use between the United States and Canada. Health Serv Res 1998;33:467-87.
19. Ritchie JL, Phillips KA, Luft HS. Coronary angioplasty. Statewide experience in California. Circulation 1993;88:2735-43.
20. Sigwart U, Puel J, Mirkovitch V, et al. Intravascular stents to prevent occlusion and restenosis after transluminal angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1987;316:701-6.
21. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, et al. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 1995;91:1676-88.
22. Schomig A, Neumann F-J, Kastrati A, et al. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1084-9.
23. Leon MB, Baim DS, Popma JJ, et al. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1665-71.
24. Rankin JM, Spinelli JJ, Carere RG, et al. Improved clinical outcome after widespread use of coronary artery stenting in Canada. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1957-65.
25. Topol EJ, Califf RM. Scorecard cardiovascular medicine: Its impact and future directions. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:65-70.