Frozen section examination of the endocervical margin of cervical conization specimens

Gynecologic Oncology

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 305-309

  Rouzier, Roman ^a,b   Feyereisen, Estelle ^a   Constancis, Elisabeth ^a   Haddad, Bassam ^a   Dubois, Philippe ^a   Paniel, Bernard Jean ^a  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL DE CRÉTEIL   (France)

^b INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Endocervical margin; Frozen section examination

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SURGERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FROZEN SECTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION;

EID: 0042123807     PISSN: 00908258     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00324-X     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Jakus S., Edmonds P., Dunton C., King S.A. Margin status and excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia a review . Obstet Gynecol Surv. 55:2000;520-527.
2. Gupta R.K. Frozen sections in cervical conization. A cytohistopathologic approach in the early diagnosis of carcinoma cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 38:1971;248-250.
3. Hannigan E.V., Simpson J.S., Dillard E.A. Jr, Dinh T.V. Frozen section evaluation of cervical conization specimens. J Reprod Med. 31:1986;11-14.
4. Hoffman M.S., Collins E., Roberts W.S., Fiorica J.V., Gunasekaran S., Cavanagh D. Cervical conization with frozen section before planned hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 82:1993;394-398.
5. Kaufman R.H. Frozen section evaluation of the cervical conization specimen. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 10:1967;838-852.
6. Neiger R., Bailey S.A., Wall A.M. 3rd, Jennings J.B., Gallup D.G. Evaluating cervical cone biopsy specimens with frozen sections at hysterectomy. J Reprod Med. 36:1991;103-107.
7. Woodford H.D., Poston W., Elkins T.E. Reliability of the frozen section in sharp knife cone biopsy of the cervix. J Reprod Med. 31:1986;951-953.
8. Weber S., Storm F.K., Stitt J., Mahvi D.M. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery. Cancer J Sci Am. 3:1997;273-277.
9. Noguchi M., Minami M., Earashi M., Taniya T., Miyazaki I.I., Mizukami Y., Nonomura A., Nishijima H., Takanaka T., Kawashima H., Saito Y., Takashima C., Nakamura S., Michigishi T., Yokoyama K. Pathologic assessment of surgical margins on frozen and permanent sections in breast conserving surgery. Breast Cancer. 2:1995;27-33.
10. Shah O., Melamed J., Lepor H. Analysis of apical soft tissue margins during radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 165:2001;1943-1948.
11. Buxton E.J., Luesley D.M., Wade-Evans T., Jordan J.A. Residual disease after cone biopsy completeness of excision and follow-up cytology as predictive factors . Obstet Gynecol. 70:1987;529-532.
12. Naumann R.W., Bell M.C., Alvarez R.D., Edwards R.P., Partridge E.E., Helm C.W., Shingleton H.M., McGee J.A., Higgins R.V., Hall J.B. LLETZ is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold-knife conization. Gynecol Oncol. 55:1994;224-228.
13. Flannelly G., Langhan H., Jandial L., Mana E., Campbell M., Kitchener H. A study of treatment failures following large loop excision of the transformation zone for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 104:1997;718-722.
14. Jain S., Tseng C.J., Horng S.G., Soong Y.K., Pao C.C. Negative predictive value of human papillomavirus test following conization of the cervix uteri. Gynecol Oncol. 82:2001;177-180.
15. Bekassy Z., Ahlgren M., Eriksson M., Lindh E. Carbon dioxide laser miniconization for treatment of human papillomavirus infection associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 74:1995;822-826.
16. Andersen E.S., Pedersen B., Nielsen K. Laser conization the results of treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia . Gynecol Oncol. 54:1994;201-204.
17. Livasy C.A., Maygarden S.J., Rajaratnam C.T., Novotny D.B. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3 a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement . Mod Pathol. 12:1999;233-238.
18. Andersen E.S., Nielsen K., Larsen G. Laser conization follow-up in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the cone margin . Gynecol Oncol. 39:1990;328-331.
19. Tancer M.L. Observations on prevention and management of vesicovaginal fistula after total hysterectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 175:1992;501-506.
20. Lapaquette T.K., Dinh T.V., Hannigan E.V., Doherty M.G., Yandell R.B., Buchanan V.S. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol. 82:1993;440-443.
21. Lopes A., Morgan P., Murdoch J., Piura B., Monaghan J.M. The case for conservative management of "incomplete excision" of CIN after laser conization. Gynecol Oncol. 49:1993;247-249.
22. Murdoch J.B., Morgan P.R., Lopes A., Monaghan J.M. Histological incomplete excision of CIN after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) merits careful follow up, not retreatment. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 99:1992;990-993.
23. Paterson-Brown S., Chappatte O.A., Clark S.K., Wright A., Maxwell P., Taub N.A., Raju K.S. The significance of cone biopsy resection margins. Gynecol Oncol. 46:1992;182-185.
24. Husseinzadeh N., Shbaro I., Wesseler T. Predictive value of cone margins and post-cone endocervical curettage with residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 33:1989;198-200.