Possibilities and limitations of interspecific hybridization involving greengram (Phaseolus radiatus) and blackgram (Phaseolus mungo)

Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Volumn 72, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 676-678

  Singh, B B ^a   Dikshit, H K ^a,b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PULSES RESEARCH   (India)

^b INDIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Blackgram; Breeding; Greengram; Interspecific hybridization; Plant type; Pulse improvement

Indexed keywords

VIGNA MUNGO; VIGNA RADIATA VAR. RADIATA;

EID: 0042073185     PISSN: 00195022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Ahn C S and Hartmann. 1978a. Interspecific hybridization among four species of genus Vigna. (in) Proceedings of International Mungbean Symposium, held during 16-19 August 1977 at University of the Philippines, Los Banos, Philippines, pp 240-60.
2. Reddy K R and Singh D P. 1989. Transgressive segregation in wide and varietal crosses of blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 49: 131-4.
3. Singh D P. 1990. Distant hybridization in genus Vigna: A review. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 50: 268-76.
4. Singh S K, Singh M N and Singh U P. 2001. Studies on the interspecific hybridization between mungbean and urdbean. (in) National Symposium on Pulses for Sustainable Agriculture and Nutritional Security, held during 17-19 April 2001 at New Delhi.
5. Verma R P S and Singh D P. 1987. Problems and prospects of interspecific hybridization involving greengram and blackgram. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 56: 535-7.
6. William C J and Gepts P. 1999. Segregation for performance in recombinant inbred populations resulting from inter-gene pool crosses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 106: 4 556-65.