The placement of digital values in configural displays

Displays

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 85-96

  Calcaterra, Jeffrey A ^a   Bennett, Kevin B ^a  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alpha numerics; Configural displays; Digital values; Graphical displays

Indexed keywords

ANALOG STORAGE; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DIGITAL DEVICES; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

GRAPHICAL DISPLAYS;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

EID: 0042029543     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0141-9382(03)00018-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Tukey J.W. Some graphic and semigraphic dipslays. Bancroft T.A. Statistical papers in honor of George W. Snedecor. 1972;296 Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
2. Benbasat I., Dexter A.S. An investigation of the effectiveness of color and graphical information presentation under varying time constraints. MIS Quarterly. 10:1986;59-81.
3. Bennett K.B., Walters B. Configural display design techniques considered at multiple levels of evaluation. Human Factors. 43:2001;415-434.
4. Bennett K.B., Flach J.M. Graphical displays: implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving. Human Factors. 34:1992;513-533.
5. Bennett K.B., Toms M.L., Woods D.D. Emergent features and configural elements: designing more effective configural displays. Human Factors. 35:1993;71-97.
6. Brunswick E. Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Second ed. 1956;University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
7. Carter L.F. The relative effectiveness of presenting numerical data by the use of tables and graphs. Fitts P.M. Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports, Washington, DC. 1947;65-72.
8. Coury B.G., Pietras C.M. Alphanumeric and graphic displays for dynamic process monitoring and control. Ergonomics. 32:1989;1373-1389.
9. Hansen J.P. An experimental investigation of configural, digital, and temporal information on process displays. Human Factors. 37:1995;539-552.
10. Hink J.K., Wogalter M.S., Eustace J.K. Display of quantitative information: are grables better than plain graphs or tables? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting. 1996;Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA. pp. 1155-1159.
11. Hink J.K., Eustace J.K., Wogalter M.S. Do grables enable the extraction of quantitative information better than pure graphs or tables? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 22:1998;439-447.
12. Kiefer R.J., Angell L.S. A comparison of the effects of an analogue versus digital speedometer on driver performance in a task environment similar to driving. Gale A.G., Brown I.D., Haslegrave C.M., Kruysse H.W., Taylor S.P. Vision in vehicles IV. 1993;283-290 North-Holland, Amsterdam.
13. Meyer J., Shinar D., Leiser D. Multiple factors that determine performance with tables and graphs. Human Factors. 39:1997;268-286.
14. Powers M., Lashley C., Sanchez P.A., Shneiderman B. An experimental comparison of tabular and graphic data presentation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 20:1984;545-566.
15. Stone E.R., Yates J.F., Parker A.M. Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 3:1997;243-256.
16. Walter W. Ergonomic information evaluation of analogue and digital coding of instruments in vehicles. Gale A.G., Haslegrave C.M., Moorhead I., Taylor S.P. Vision in vehicles III. 1991;205-211 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
17. Washburne J.N. An experimental study of various graphic, tabular and textual methods of presenting quantitative material. Journal of Educational Psychology. 17:1927;361-376. see also pp. 465-487.
18. deSanctis G. Computer graphics as decision aids: directions for research. Decision Science. 15:1984;463-487.
19. Macdonald-Ross M. How numbers are shown: a review of research on the presentation of quantitative data in texts. AV Communication Review. 25:1977;359-409.
20. van Nes F.L. Determining temporal differences with analogue and digital time displays. Ergonomics. 15:1972;73-79.
21. Bennett K.B., Nagy A.L., Flach J.M. Visual display. Salvendy G. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. Second ed. 1997;659-696 Wiley, New York.
22. Schwartz D.R., Howell W.C. Optional stopping performance under graphic and numeric CRT formatting. Human Factors. 27:1985;433-444.
23. Pomerantz J.R. Visual form perception: an overview. Nusbaum H.C., Schwab E.C. Pattern recognition by humans and machines, 2. Visual perception. 1986;1-30 Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
24. Lovie P. Identifying outliers. Lovie A.D. New developments in statistics for psychology and the social sciences. 1986;44-69 The British Psychological Society and Methuen, London, UK.
25. Wickens C.D., Carswell C.M. The proximity compatibility principle: its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors. 37:1995;473-494.